header-logo header-logo

17 October 2013 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7580 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Chris Grayling: doing the best for Britain?

169968842_2

Roger Smith muses on a potentially uneasy celebration for the lord chancellor

These days, lord chancellors have to front the marketing drive of the legal profession in the global economy. Thus, the Law Society, Bar, and other members of a legal consortium were faced with Chris Grayling leading their announcement of a Global Law Summit. This is intended to celebrate the 800th anniversary of the signing of Magna Carta and provide an opportunity for UK lawyers to display their wares. The lord chancellor duly went through the motions, clearly aware that the great charter of English liberty represented a bit of a trap for a minister currently in the process of trying to slash legal aid and cut back judicial review.

Grayling’s sensitivity to comparison with tyrants down the ages from King John onward was evident in his Daily Mail article last month where he announced his assault on judicial review. He mused: “I will no doubt be accused of killing justice and destroying Magna Carta.” With uncharacteristic diffidence,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll