header-logo header-logo

27 March 2024
Issue: 8065 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Civil legal aid: comparing & repairing

The government has pinpointed four initiatives for investigation, after comparing civil legal aid systems in other jurisdictions

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) report, Review of civil legal aid: comparative analysis of legal aid systems, published last week, analysed delivery in Australia, Canada, Finland, the Netherlands, the USA and Scotland.

The MoJ aims to examine a US initiative—enabling cross-government collaboration in resolving issues—and three initiatives from the Netherlands, a ‘tiered model’ for triaging and prioritising cases, building trust and autonomy between oversight bodies and providers, and feedback loops for continuous improvement.

It identified ten principles for effective provision, including long-term funding and investing in early intervention.

Law Society president Nick Emmerson said: ‘The report rightly recognises that “technology is not a panacea when it comes to legal aid”.

‘While technology offers the opportunity to provide people with more ways to get legal advice, there is no substitute for the face-to-face services that are particularly vital for those who are digitally excluded, complex cases or those involving people with particular vulnerabilities.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll