header-logo header-logo

27 March 2024
Issue: 8065 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Civil legal aid: comparing & repairing

The government has pinpointed four initiatives for investigation, after comparing civil legal aid systems in other jurisdictions

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) report, Review of civil legal aid: comparative analysis of legal aid systems, published last week, analysed delivery in Australia, Canada, Finland, the Netherlands, the USA and Scotland.

The MoJ aims to examine a US initiative—enabling cross-government collaboration in resolving issues—and three initiatives from the Netherlands, a ‘tiered model’ for triaging and prioritising cases, building trust and autonomy between oversight bodies and providers, and feedback loops for continuous improvement.

It identified ten principles for effective provision, including long-term funding and investing in early intervention.

Law Society president Nick Emmerson said: ‘The report rightly recognises that “technology is not a panacea when it comes to legal aid”.

‘While technology offers the opportunity to provide people with more ways to get legal advice, there is no substitute for the face-to-face services that are particularly vital for those who are digitally excluded, complex cases or those involving people with particular vulnerabilities.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll