header-logo header-logo

Civil legal aid: rolling down the road?

20 January 2023 / Roger Smith
Issue: 8009 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail
107049
Far from a bold initiative, the announcement of a distant & unfunded review of civil legal aid is an abdication of government responsibility, says Roger Smith

What’s that hollow metallic sound? Blow me. It’s an old tin can being kicked down the asphalt outside the Ministry of Justice (MoJ). The good news: the MoJ is going to review the sustainability of civil legal aid. The bad: the review won’t be published until 2024. So Dominic Raab has executed the most hackneyed Yes Minister tactic. He has announced a review that will shut down serious discussion of a major political issue until after the next election. And it is pretty likely, for one reason or another, that he will not still be in office to deal with its re-emergence.

The announcement of the review not only stalls immediate action; it has the added advantage of putting interested parties in a difficult place. Do they sneer or cheer? The Law Society reported that it had ‘called for a review of civil

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
back-to-top-scroll