header-logo header-logo

Civil litigation reform in Scotland—what next?

13 July 2018 / John MacKenzie
Issue: 7801 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail
nlj_7801_mackenzie

John MacKenzie considers how well the Gill Review reforms, including DBAs, will work in Scotland & compares them to the Jackson reforms

  • Considers how the Civil Litigation (Expenses and Group Proceedings) (Scotland) Act 2018 will work.
  • Looks at DBAs, third party funding and group proceedings
  • Compares the reforms of Scotland’s Gill & England & Wales’ Jackson

On 1 May 2018 the Scottish Parliament passed the Civil Litigation (Expenses and Group Proceedings) (Scotland) Act Bill. Now that it has Royal Assent it is the Civil Litigation (Expenses and Group Proceedings) (Scotland) Act 2018. But what effect will the Act have, and what’s next for civil litigation in Scotland?

Reform of the Scottish courts has been proceeding slowly.

The Gill Review

This is the latest step in a process of reform. Lord Gill’s review on the civil courts in Scotland started the latest push for reform and was published on 30 September 2009.

At that time Lord Gill said: For the last 20 years, the Court of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll