header-logo header-logo

Civil litigation reform in Scotland—what next?

13 July 2018 / John MacKenzie
Issue: 7801 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail
nlj_7801_mackenzie

John MacKenzie considers how well the Gill Review reforms, including DBAs, will work in Scotland & compares them to the Jackson reforms

  • Considers how the Civil Litigation (Expenses and Group Proceedings) (Scotland) Act 2018 will work.
  • Looks at DBAs, third party funding and group proceedings
  • Compares the reforms of Scotland’s Gill & England & Wales’ Jackson

On 1 May 2018 the Scottish Parliament passed the Civil Litigation (Expenses and Group Proceedings) (Scotland) Act Bill. Now that it has Royal Assent it is the Civil Litigation (Expenses and Group Proceedings) (Scotland) Act 2018. But what effect will the Act have, and what’s next for civil litigation in Scotland?

Reform of the Scottish courts has been proceeding slowly.

The Gill Review

This is the latest step in a process of reform. Lord Gill’s review on the civil courts in Scotland started the latest push for reform and was published on 30 September 2009.

At that time Lord Gill said: For the last 20 years, the Court of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll