header-logo header-logo

Civil war?

22 July 2016 / Adrian Jack
Issue: 7708 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , CPR
printer mail-detail
nlj_7708_jack

Adrian Jack reports on the current consultation into civil appeal reform

The Civil Procedure Rule Committee is consulting on important changes to the rules governing appeals to the Court of Appeal (Civil Division). They are likely to prevent over 10% of appeals being heard which would otherwise succeed.

The proposals follow increased delays in the hearing of appeals with some “hear-by” dates fixed 19 months after the date of issue of an appeal. Lord Dyson MR says the position is not “acceptable or sustainable”. The most important proposed reforms are:

  • removing the right to an oral hearing following a refusal of an application for permission to appeal (PTA); and
  • increasing the threshold for granting PTA to the Court of Appeal, but not to the High Court or within the County Court.

Oral application for PTA

The first change will affect many appeals which currently succeed. Instead of a right to make an oral application for PTA, a single lord justice will have a discretion to order an oral hearing, but the number of such

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll