header-logo header-logo

22 July 2016 / Adrian Jack
Issue: 7708 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , CPR
printer mail-detail

Civil war?

nlj_7708_jack

Adrian Jack reports on the current consultation into civil appeal reform

The Civil Procedure Rule Committee is consulting on important changes to the rules governing appeals to the Court of Appeal (Civil Division). They are likely to prevent over 10% of appeals being heard which would otherwise succeed.

The proposals follow increased delays in the hearing of appeals with some “hear-by” dates fixed 19 months after the date of issue of an appeal. Lord Dyson MR says the position is not “acceptable or sustainable”. The most important proposed reforms are:

  • removing the right to an oral hearing following a refusal of an application for permission to appeal (PTA); and
  • increasing the threshold for granting PTA to the Court of Appeal, but not to the High Court or within the County Court.

Oral application for PTA

The first change will affect many appeals which currently succeed. Instead of a right to make an oral application for PTA, a single lord justice will have a discretion to order an oral hearing, but the number of such

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll