header-logo header-logo

Civil war?

22 July 2016 / Adrian Jack
Issue: 7708 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , CPR
printer mail-detail
nlj_7708_jack

Adrian Jack reports on the current consultation into civil appeal reform

The Civil Procedure Rule Committee is consulting on important changes to the rules governing appeals to the Court of Appeal (Civil Division). They are likely to prevent over 10% of appeals being heard which would otherwise succeed.

The proposals follow increased delays in the hearing of appeals with some “hear-by” dates fixed 19 months after the date of issue of an appeal. Lord Dyson MR says the position is not “acceptable or sustainable”. The most important proposed reforms are:

  • removing the right to an oral hearing following a refusal of an application for permission to appeal (PTA); and
  • increasing the threshold for granting PTA to the Court of Appeal, but not to the High Court or within the County Court.

Oral application for PTA

The first change will affect many appeals which currently succeed. Instead of a right to make an oral application for PTA, a single lord justice will have a discretion to order an oral hearing, but the number of such

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll