header-logo header-logo

Civil way: 13 June 2025

Wording of a deadline; a new type of law firm; the route to an intermediary; small claim: big loss.

ONE DAY OUT

An order which requires an act to be done should set out the specific deadline date for compliance. That’s CPR PD 40B, para 8.2. In Leadingway Consultants Ltd v Saab and another [2025] EWCA Civ 582, however, the unless order in question used the less precise formula of the number of days from the date of the order for the second defendant to make a required application. His solicitors made an innocent day-counting mistake (which in the circumstances I would probably have done too) and filed the application one day late. Result? Debarred from making the application and defending the claim. Relief from those sanctions was granted below. What seems to have weighed heavily with the Court of Appeal in upholding that decision was the PD non-compliance, as it took time out to remind that well-intentioned incompetence should not usually attract relief from sanction.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll