header-logo header-logo

Civil way: 13 June 2025

Wording of a deadline; a new type of law firm; the route to an intermediary; small claim: big loss.

ONE DAY OUT

An order which requires an act to be done should set out the specific deadline date for compliance. That’s CPR PD 40B, para 8.2. In Leadingway Consultants Ltd v Saab and another [2025] EWCA Civ 582, however, the unless order in question used the less precise formula of the number of days from the date of the order for the second defendant to make a required application. His solicitors made an innocent day-counting mistake (which in the circumstances I would probably have done too) and filed the application one day late. Result? Debarred from making the application and defending the claim. Relief from those sanctions was granted below. What seems to have weighed heavily with the Court of Appeal in upholding that decision was the PD non-compliance, as it took time out to remind that well-intentioned incompetence should not usually attract relief from sanction.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll