header-logo header-logo

11 November 2020 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 7910 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Civil way
printer mail-detail

Civil Way: 13 November 2020

Family Arbs: the likely bill; Human Rights alive; Champers with water for tenants; Fit and proper on the pitch

LORD WILSON WILL SEE YOU NOW

As the courts struggle to timeously deal with financial remedy applications, arbitrations under the Family Law Arbitration Scheme (IFLSA) have taken off. Fast, media free, no leaky roofs or dodgy lifts, coffee and biscuits (if you are lucky). And with appeal immunity? That’s where Haley v Haley [2020] EWCA CIV 1369, [2020] All ER (D) 110 (Oct) comes in. The Court of Appeal has unanimously and bravely ruled that when consideration is being given by the court to making an order in the terms of the arbitrator’s award, then, except for a supervening event or mistake, it was not locked in to applying the test under the Arbitration Act 1996 (AA 1996) (substantive jurisdiction lacked, serious irregularity or award wrong in law) when there was a challenge. The correct test was the less strict appeals test where fairness was relevant. King LJ disagreed with the view

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

DWF—11 appointments

DWF—11 appointments

DWF strengthens North West teams with 11 newly qualified solicitors

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll