header-logo header-logo

11 November 2020 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 7910 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Civil way
printer mail-detail

Civil Way: 13 November 2020

Family Arbs: the likely bill; Human Rights alive; Champers with water for tenants; Fit and proper on the pitch

LORD WILSON WILL SEE YOU NOW

As the courts struggle to timeously deal with financial remedy applications, arbitrations under the Family Law Arbitration Scheme (IFLSA) have taken off. Fast, media free, no leaky roofs or dodgy lifts, coffee and biscuits (if you are lucky). And with appeal immunity? That’s where Haley v Haley [2020] EWCA CIV 1369, [2020] All ER (D) 110 (Oct) comes in. The Court of Appeal has unanimously and bravely ruled that when consideration is being given by the court to making an order in the terms of the arbitrator’s award, then, except for a supervening event or mistake, it was not locked in to applying the test under the Arbitration Act 1996 (AA 1996) (substantive jurisdiction lacked, serious irregularity or award wrong in law) when there was a challenge. The correct test was the less strict appeals test where fairness was relevant. King LJ disagreed with the view

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

International arbitration team strengthened by double partner hire

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Firm celebrates trio holding senior regional law society and junior lawyers division roles

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Partner joins commercial and business litigation team in London

NEWS
The Legal Action Group (LAG)—the UK charity dedicated to advancing access to justice—has unveiled its calendar of training courses, seminars and conferences designed to support lawyers, advisers and other legal professionals in tackling key areas of public interest law
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
back-to-top-scroll