header-logo header-logo

11 November 2020 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 7910 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Civil way
printer mail-detail

Civil Way: 13 November 2020

Family Arbs: the likely bill; Human Rights alive; Champers with water for tenants; Fit and proper on the pitch

LORD WILSON WILL SEE YOU NOW

As the courts struggle to timeously deal with financial remedy applications, arbitrations under the Family Law Arbitration Scheme (IFLSA) have taken off. Fast, media free, no leaky roofs or dodgy lifts, coffee and biscuits (if you are lucky). And with appeal immunity? That’s where Haley v Haley [2020] EWCA CIV 1369, [2020] All ER (D) 110 (Oct) comes in. The Court of Appeal has unanimously and bravely ruled that when consideration is being given by the court to making an order in the terms of the arbitrator’s award, then, except for a supervening event or mistake, it was not locked in to applying the test under the Arbitration Act 1996 (AA 1996) (substantive jurisdiction lacked, serious irregularity or award wrong in law) when there was a challenge. The correct test was the less strict appeals test where fairness was relevant. King LJ disagreed with the view

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll