header-logo header-logo

Civil way: 19 June 2020

17 June 2020 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 7891 / Categories: Procedure & practice , Features , Civil way
printer mail-detail
Go low with the CFO; Possessions reparalysed; High Street lessee win; Family cases to surge.
Flexible tenancy shock; Big financial remedy changes

Nothing special

The special and basic account rates with the Court Funds Office (CFO) have been savaged—have you ever tried savaging a peanut?—as from 1 June 2020. In line with commercial sector practice, the decision to do this was announced on 1 June 2020. As an emergency measure, the special account rate reduces from 0.5% to 0.1% and the basic account rate from 0.1% to 0.05%. The Bank of England base rate now sits at 0.1% to which the CFO rates have responded. However, the reduced rates compare unfavourably with what is on offer from NS&1: for example, 3.25% on its Junior ISA, 0.90% on its Direct Isa and 1% on its Direct Saver.

Any claimant’s advocate who joins a remote protected party settlement approval appointment deserves to be muted and drenched in cheap sanitiser if unarmed with some decent investment proposals away from the CFO (see ‘Civil way’,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll