header-logo header-logo

Civil way: 6 February 2026

Cannan fire; easing in rental reform; the no-fix ‘fix’; upstairs practice; making ‘em up.

SMITH 0: CANNAN 1

So, there you are to decide an appeal in the Upper Tribunal of the Tax and Chancery Chamber (UT) having been appointed there just a little over one year before. You are sitting with a High Court judge of over eight years’ standing who is former president of the Competition Appeal Tribunal. Just the two of you. And you cannot agree. You could toss a coin; ask the usher what they think; agree to abandon the match and dump the appeal on others; go for lunch and discover if things look different after a couple of glasses of Chablis; knuckle under; or stand your ground.

Judge Jonathan Cannan stood his ground and opted for the appeal to be dismissed. Mr Justice Marcus Smith stood his ground and opted for the appeal to be allowed. Using his casting vote, the High Court judge prevailed. The Court

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—James Paterson

Charles Russell Speechlys—James Paterson

Charles Russell Speechlys further bolsters Private Equity expertise with the appointment of James Paterson

Ellisons—Samuel Flower

Ellisons—Samuel Flower

Ellisons strengthens Rural Affairs team with senior appointment

Sidley—Carl Hotton

Sidley—Carl Hotton

Sidley adds insurance mergers and acquisitions partner to London office

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll