header-logo header-logo

Civil way: 6 February 2026

Cannan fire; easing in rental reform; the no-fix ‘fix’; upstairs practice; making ‘em up.

SMITH 0: CANNAN 1

So, there you are to decide an appeal in the Upper Tribunal of the Tax and Chancery Chamber (UT) having been appointed there just a little over one year before. You are sitting with a High Court judge of over eight years’ standing who is former president of the Competition Appeal Tribunal. Just the two of you. And you cannot agree. You could toss a coin; ask the usher what they think; agree to abandon the match and dump the appeal on others; go for lunch and discover if things look different after a couple of glasses of Chablis; knuckle under; or stand your ground.

Judge Jonathan Cannan stood his ground and opted for the appeal to be dismissed. Mr Justice Marcus Smith stood his ground and opted for the appeal to be allowed. Using his casting vote, the High Court judge prevailed. The Court

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Orwins—Maryam Abbasi

Orwins—Maryam Abbasi

Senior associate joins family law team in London

Tees Law—Stephen Williams

Tees Law—Stephen Williams

Firm appoints chief financial officer as it expands Essex office footprint

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Restructuring and insolvency practice strengthened by partner hire

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
A landmark ruling has delivered the first judicial application of the UK’s anti-SLAPP regime and provided fresh guidance on abusive litigation
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
back-to-top-scroll