header-logo header-logo

12 October 2012
Issue: 7533 / Categories: Features , Civil way , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 12 October 2012

Some criminal advocates only change their speeches to the jury and some family legal aid counsel can only afford to change their shirts once a year

CPR LOVE IN

Some criminal advocates only change their speeches to the jury and some family legal aid counsel can only afford to change their shirts once a year. With the Civil Procedure Rules 1988 you get at least two annual changes which are reactive to the tiniest revision in legislation. Even the odd piece of punctuation may be improved upon. The 59th CPR update got going on 1 October 2012. It takes in the Civil Procedure (Amendment No 2) Rules 2012 (SI 2012/2208) and with certain new rules the oh so carefully considered use of the word “will” instead of “must” occurs because the rules committee believes that imposing a notional duty on the court to perform its individual non-discretionary functions with a “must” is, in general, unnecessary and, arguably, misleading. So the updates are caring and we will soon set about devising some big celebration

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll