header-logo header-logo

07 May 2020 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 7885 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Civil way
printer mail-detail

Civil way 8 May 2020

COVID-19

Trespassing on 51Z

We stopped pressed last time on the exclusion from the possession claim and possession enforcement stay of trespass cases (see ‘Civil way’, NLJ 24 April 2010, p20). There are trespass cases and trespass cases. Currently, however, there is no stay distinction between the hardcore squatter on the one hand and the licensee on the other hand who is converted into a squatter when they stay put at the expiration of notice terminating their right to occupy. The latter would include, for example, the service occupier whose employment has ceased and the wife of a serviceman whose right to occupy married quarters has come to an end with the dissolution of the marriage.

The PD that has become the 120th update and which amends CPR PD 51Z clarifies that, as we had suggested, the stay does not preclude the issue of a claim which will then stand stayed. The further clarification is that parties to stayed possession proceedings can make applications for case management directions where

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll