header-logo header-logo

Civil way FEATURED THIS WEEK

11 December 2008
Issue: 7349 / Categories: Features , Child law , Mediation , Family
printer mail-detail

Stephen Gold is a district judge

Activities—but how active?

Activities—but how active?

Before making a final contact order (or varying or discharging one) the court may give a contact activity direction (CAD) if there is a dispute and on making a final order the court may impose a contact activity condition (CAC) which amounts to the same thing. Activity? This is likely to be a programme, class or counselling or guidance session which assists in establishing, maintaining or improving contact, or addresses violent behaviour.

The CAD or CAC cannot be used to compel medical or psychiatric examination, assessment or treatment or participation in mediation. The activity must be provided in a place to which the individual concerned can reasonably be expected to travel and the court must first obtain information—Cafcass or a Welsh family proceedings officer can be asked to supply it and it will particularly cover any conflict with the individual’s religious beliefs and interference with work or education—about the individual and the likely eff ect of the CAD or CAC

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll