header-logo header-logo

05 September 2015
Categories: Legal News , Competition
printer mail-detail

Claim against Visa continues

An appeal by Asda, Debenhams and other high street retailers to uphold an extended limitation period on their claim against Visa Europe and Visa Inc for breach of EU, UK and Irish competition law, has been declined by the Court of Appeal, in Arcadia Group Brands and others v Visa Inc and others [2015] EWCA Civ 883. However, the claim, worth an estimated £570m, now continues in the High Court.

The retailers claim Visa inflated the price they paid for accepting credit and debit cards since 1977 by charging a multilateral interchange fee (MIF), and unlawfully restricting competition.The MIF sets a minimum price that is paid by the retailer’s bank to the customer’s bank whenever a customer uses Visa.

The Court of Appeal held that all claims dating between 1977 and 2007 are time-barred under the Limitation Act 1980, s 32(1)(b). As to whether an extension was justified on the basis Visa concealed facts, the Court held only those facts sufficient to plead a prima facie claim were relevant to S 32(1)(b).

Categories: Legal News , Competition
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll