header-logo header-logo

Claims drop since fee rise

23 November 2016
Issue: 7724 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The number of claims for discrimination or unfair treatment at work has fallen from 16,000 to 7,000, on average, since employment tribunal fees came in.

Fees of up to £1,200 were introduced in 2013. Figures published by the Trades Union Congress (TUC) earlier this month reveal a drop of nearly three-quarters for unfair dismissal claims, and falls of more than 70% for sex discrimination, 58% for race discrimination and 54% for disability discrimination claims.

The TUC’s figures show that in 2012/13 there were 191,541 claims. In 2015/16 there were 83,031 claims.

The TUC has called on the government to publish a review on the impact of fees, and renewed its calls for the fees to be abolished.

TUC General Secretary Frances O’Grady said: “The evidence is there for all to see. These fees—of up to £1,200, even if you’re on the minimum wage—are pricing out thousands each month from pursuing cases.”

Both the Law Society and the Bar Council have also urged the government to assess the impact of the fees on access to justice.

In June, the Justice Select Committee reported a drop of almost 70% in the number of cases brought before employment tribunals. The committee reported that, while some degree of financial risk may act as an important discipline for claimants, factors such as inequality of arms and the vulnerability and financial means of claimants needed to be taken into account. Bob Neill MP, Committee Chair said: “Where there is conflict between the objectives of achieving full cost recovery and preserving access to justice, the latter must prevail.”

Issue: 7724 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
In NLJ this week, Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre marks Pro Bono Week by urging lawyers to recognise the emotional toll of pro bono work
Can a lease legally last only days—or even hours? Professor Mark Pawlowski of the University of Greenwich explores the question in this week's NLJ
RFC Seraing v FIFA, in which the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) reaffirmed that awards by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) may be reviewed by EU courts on public-policy grounds, is under examination in this week's NLJ by Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law, Zurich
back-to-top-scroll