header-logo header-logo

23 November 2016
Issue: 7724 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Claims drop since fee rise

The number of claims for discrimination or unfair treatment at work has fallen from 16,000 to 7,000, on average, since employment tribunal fees came in.

Fees of up to £1,200 were introduced in 2013. Figures published by the Trades Union Congress (TUC) earlier this month reveal a drop of nearly three-quarters for unfair dismissal claims, and falls of more than 70% for sex discrimination, 58% for race discrimination and 54% for disability discrimination claims.

The TUC’s figures show that in 2012/13 there were 191,541 claims. In 2015/16 there were 83,031 claims.

The TUC has called on the government to publish a review on the impact of fees, and renewed its calls for the fees to be abolished.

TUC General Secretary Frances O’Grady said: “The evidence is there for all to see. These fees—of up to £1,200, even if you’re on the minimum wage—are pricing out thousands each month from pursuing cases.”

Both the Law Society and the Bar Council have also urged the government to assess the impact of the fees on access to justice.

In June, the Justice Select Committee reported a drop of almost 70% in the number of cases brought before employment tribunals. The committee reported that, while some degree of financial risk may act as an important discipline for claimants, factors such as inequality of arms and the vulnerability and financial means of claimants needed to be taken into account. Bob Neill MP, Committee Chair said: “Where there is conflict between the objectives of achieving full cost recovery and preserving access to justice, the latter must prevail.”

Issue: 7724 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll