header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
17 January 2025 / Vanessa Kelly
Issue: 8100 / Categories: Features , Employment , Harassment
printer mail-detail

Clamping down on third-party sexual harassment

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
203861
Vanessa Kelly outlines the new duty on employers to prevent sexual harassment & how this should impact their dealings with third parties
  • Since October 2024, employers have been under a new legal duty to take reasonable steps to prevent sexual harassment of their employees in the course of their employment, including by third parties.
  • Among other steps, employers should review and update third-party commercial contracts to include appropriate contractual obligations and indemnities covering incidents of third-party sexual harassment.

On 26 October 2024, the Worker Protection (Amendment of Equality Act 2010) Act 2023 (‘the Act’) came into force, requiring employers to proactively take reasonable steps to prevent the sexual harassment of employees during the course of their employment.

It is a preventative, anticipatory duty, requiring employers to take positive steps. In particular, employers will need to anticipate when employees could encounter sexual harassment and take reasonable steps to prevent such harassment. Additionally, if sexual harassment has taken place, the preventative duty requires employers to take reasonable steps to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll