header-logo header-logo

17 January 2025 / Vanessa Kelly
Issue: 8100 / Categories: Features , Employment , Harassment
printer mail-detail

Clamping down on third-party sexual harassment

203861
Vanessa Kelly outlines the new duty on employers to prevent sexual harassment & how this should impact their dealings with third parties
  • Since October 2024, employers have been under a new legal duty to take reasonable steps to prevent sexual harassment of their employees in the course of their employment, including by third parties.
  • Among other steps, employers should review and update third-party commercial contracts to include appropriate contractual obligations and indemnities covering incidents of third-party sexual harassment.

On 26 October 2024, the Worker Protection (Amendment of Equality Act 2010) Act 2023 (‘the Act’) came into force, requiring employers to proactively take reasonable steps to prevent the sexual harassment of employees during the course of their employment.

It is a preventative, anticipatory duty, requiring employers to take positive steps. In particular, employers will need to anticipate when employees could encounter sexual harassment and take reasonable steps to prevent such harassment. Additionally, if sexual harassment has taken place, the preventative duty requires employers to take reasonable steps to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll