header-logo header-logo

The Clapham claimants

28 March 2013 / Peter Thompson KC
Issue: 7554 / Categories: Opinion , Legal services , Profession , Fees , Personal injury , Jackson
printer mail-detail

Peter Thompson QC assesses the impact of Jackson on the reasonable person

The man on the Clapham omnibus is as likely as anyone to be involved in a road traffic accident and what follows applies equally to the child in the back of a Clapham mini-cab and the young woman on the pillion of a Clapham motor-cycle. They are all victims of injury caused by some insured person’s tortious behaviour. They will all have acted reasonably: they will have worn a seatbelt or helmet where appropriate, they will not have been out drinking with the driver and will not present exaggerated or fraudulent claims. All are entitled to access to justice if a settlement cannot be reached in correspondence.

Our Clapham claimants, just described, have a particular interest in the Jackson reforms that come into force on Monday. The purpose of this article is to assess their impact on the reasonable man, or woman, who is injured and entitled to redress.

At the bottom end, the small claims limit

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll