header-logo header-logo

The Clapham claimants

28 March 2013 / Peter Thompson KC
Issue: 7554 / Categories: Opinion , Legal services , Profession , Fees , Personal injury , Jackson
printer mail-detail

Peter Thompson QC assesses the impact of Jackson on the reasonable person

The man on the Clapham omnibus is as likely as anyone to be involved in a road traffic accident and what follows applies equally to the child in the back of a Clapham mini-cab and the young woman on the pillion of a Clapham motor-cycle. They are all victims of injury caused by some insured person’s tortious behaviour. They will all have acted reasonably: they will have worn a seatbelt or helmet where appropriate, they will not have been out drinking with the driver and will not present exaggerated or fraudulent claims. All are entitled to access to justice if a settlement cannot be reached in correspondence.

Our Clapham claimants, just described, have a particular interest in the Jackson reforms that come into force on Monday. The purpose of this article is to assess their impact on the reasonable man, or woman, who is injured and entitled to redress.

At the bottom end, the small claims limit

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll