header-logo header-logo

28 March 2013 / Peter Thompson KC
Issue: 7554 / Categories: Opinion , Legal services , Profession , Fees , Personal injury , Jackson
printer mail-detail

The Clapham claimants

Peter Thompson QC assesses the impact of Jackson on the reasonable person

The man on the Clapham omnibus is as likely as anyone to be involved in a road traffic accident and what follows applies equally to the child in the back of a Clapham mini-cab and the young woman on the pillion of a Clapham motor-cycle. They are all victims of injury caused by some insured person’s tortious behaviour. They will all have acted reasonably: they will have worn a seatbelt or helmet where appropriate, they will not have been out drinking with the driver and will not present exaggerated or fraudulent claims. All are entitled to access to justice if a settlement cannot be reached in correspondence.

Our Clapham claimants, just described, have a particular interest in the Jackson reforms that come into force on Monday. The purpose of this article is to assess their impact on the reasonable man, or woman, who is injured and entitled to redress.

At the bottom end, the small claims limit

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
back-to-top-scroll