header-logo header-logo

28 March 2013 / Peter Thompson KC
Issue: 7554 / Categories: Opinion , Legal services , Profession , Fees , Personal injury , Jackson
printer mail-detail

The Clapham claimants

Peter Thompson QC assesses the impact of Jackson on the reasonable person

The man on the Clapham omnibus is as likely as anyone to be involved in a road traffic accident and what follows applies equally to the child in the back of a Clapham mini-cab and the young woman on the pillion of a Clapham motor-cycle. They are all victims of injury caused by some insured person’s tortious behaviour. They will all have acted reasonably: they will have worn a seatbelt or helmet where appropriate, they will not have been out drinking with the driver and will not present exaggerated or fraudulent claims. All are entitled to access to justice if a settlement cannot be reached in correspondence.

Our Clapham claimants, just described, have a particular interest in the Jackson reforms that come into force on Monday. The purpose of this article is to assess their impact on the reasonable man, or woman, who is injured and entitled to redress.

At the bottom end, the small claims limit

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll