header-logo header-logo

24 September 2025
Issue: 8132 / Categories: Legal News , Landlord&tenant , Housing , Construction , Health & safety
printer mail-detail

Clarification on cladding costs

Leaseholders are not liable to pay for the cost of remediating dangerous cladding, the Upper Tribunal has held

Almacantar Centre Point Nominee No1 Ltd & Ors v De Valk & Ors [2025] UKUT 298 (LC) concerned the iconic Centre Point House in London’s Tottenham Court Road. The landlord contended remediating the type of dangerous cladding involved was recoverable as a service charge. The leaseholders argued the reverse.

Bhavini Patel, senior associate at Howard Kennedy, acting for ten leaseholders, said: ‘The case is important as it looks at key concepts of what was meant by “cladding”, “cladding remediation” and “unsafe”. It cannot be clearer… that the courts and tribunals will do their utmost to uphold Parliament’s intentions and to protect leaseholders from costs of remediation and work which they had no part of.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Katten Muchin Rosenman—Charlotte Hill

Katten Muchin Rosenman—Charlotte Hill

Katten strengthens financial markets and funds group in London

Hugh James—Keith Cundall & Lee Hart

Hugh James—Keith Cundall & Lee Hart

Hugh James expands national Serious Injury team with two new Partners

HFW—Rémi Ducloyer

HFW—Rémi Ducloyer

HFW continues Paris office growth with public law Partner hire

NEWS
The Court of Appeal's decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP has lifted months of uncertainty for Chartered Legal Executives while prompting a rethink of regulation and supervision
The assisted dying debate returns to Westminster as Lauren Edwards MP reintroduces legislation that stalled in the House of Lords last session despite clearing the Commons
A little-noticed provision of the Crime and Policing Act 2026 has fundamentally expanded corporate criminal liability
Artificial intelligence is transforming legal practice, but careless reliance on it is creating growing professional risks
The law offers cohabiting couples surprisingly greater protection after one partner dies than when they separate during life
back-to-top-scroll