header-logo header-logo

24 September 2025
Issue: 8132 / Categories: Legal News , Landlord&tenant , Housing , Construction , Health & safety
printer mail-detail

Clarification on cladding costs

Leaseholders are not liable to pay for the cost of remediating dangerous cladding, the Upper Tribunal has held

Almacantar Centre Point Nominee No1 Ltd & Ors v De Valk & Ors [2025] UKUT 298 (LC) concerned the iconic Centre Point House in London’s Tottenham Court Road. The landlord contended remediating the type of dangerous cladding involved was recoverable as a service charge. The leaseholders argued the reverse.

Bhavini Patel, senior associate at Howard Kennedy, acting for ten leaseholders, said: ‘The case is important as it looks at key concepts of what was meant by “cladding”, “cladding remediation” and “unsafe”. It cannot be clearer… that the courts and tribunals will do their utmost to uphold Parliament’s intentions and to protect leaseholders from costs of remediation and work which they had no part of.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Walkers—Muriel Marseille

Walkers—Muriel Marseille

Ashurst's Chief Risk Officer joins Walkers

Excello Law—John Osborne

Excello Law—John Osborne

Northern family lawyer John Osborne joins Excello

mfg Solicitors—Rebecca Rogers, Kennedy Langley & Victoria Griffiths

mfg Solicitors—Rebecca Rogers, Kennedy Langley & Victoria Griffiths

Trio of promotions announced at Kidderminster law firm mfg Solicitors

NEWS
A sole director can conspire with their own company for the purposes of the tort of unlawful means conspiracy, the High Court has ruled in a judgment with potentially wide implications for business disputes
The Court of Appeal has reinforced that domicile depends on intention rather than residence alone, in a significant post-Brexit ruling on cross-border financial remedy claims
The Chancery Division's long history comes to an end this autumn as it is reborn as the Business and Property Division, prompting questions over whether the shake-up is really necessary
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) continues to show that failing to disclose regulatory issues can attract harsher consequences than the original misconduct itself
Rejecting a generous settlement can prove an expensive mistake, as two recent high-profile cases demonstrate
back-to-top-scroll