header-logo header-logo

Clarke unveils Legal Aid Bill

22 June 2011
Issue: 7471 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Justice Secretary introduces the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill

Legal aid will continue to be available to victims of psychological as well as physical domestic abuse, and for matters concerning children with special educational needs.

Justice Secretary Ken Clarke announced the concessions in Parliament this week as he introduced the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill.

Clarke said he would retain the £100,000 equity disregard for homeowners, and that he had dropped a proposal to charge £100 where legal aid recipients had more than £1,000 in savings.

As revealed in the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) green paper last November, the bill removes legal aid from most family law matters, education law, housing (except where there is a threat of homelessness), personal injury, clinical negligence, employment, immigration (except for detention cases) and social welfare law.

The Legal Services Commission will be abolished, and its administrative duties passed to the holder of a new civil service role, the director of legal aid casework.

Justice minister Jonathan Djanogly said: “These reforms will ensure that we have a legal aid system which is targeted at those who need it most, in the most serious cases, as well as providing value for money to the taxpayer.”

The Bill also implements Lord Justice Jackson’s proposals on civil litigation costs.

However, legal aid lawyers accused the government of failing to listen to the public’s concerns. Legal aid practitioners group (LAPG) co-chair Jenny Beck said: "We are appalled that the government has not modified its response despite 5,000 responses to the consultation.

“The government has not listened. The proposals unravel the legal aid system. There will be very little access to justice for the poor. Once the organisations that perform this service are gone, they will never be replaced.”

Steve Hynes, director of the Legal Action Group (LAG), said legal advice agencies across the country faced potential closure due to funding cuts, and that both Birmingham and Ealing Borough faced cuts of more than £1m.

He said LAG had been “working behind the scenes” to try to secure a joint review between sector providers and the government on welfare law and alternative means of funding, but the government had not yet agreed. He speculated that Clarke may announce this next week to coincide with the second reading of the Bill.

Issue: 7471 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
In NLJ this week, Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre marks Pro Bono Week by urging lawyers to recognise the emotional toll of pro bono work
Can a lease legally last only days—or even hours? Professor Mark Pawlowski of the University of Greenwich explores the question in this week's NLJ
RFC Seraing v FIFA, in which the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) reaffirmed that awards by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) may be reviewed by EU courts on public-policy grounds, is under examination in this week's NLJ by Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law, Zurich
back-to-top-scroll