header-logo header-logo

22 June 2011
Issue: 7471 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Clarke unveils Legal Aid Bill

Justice Secretary introduces the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill

Legal aid will continue to be available to victims of psychological as well as physical domestic abuse, and for matters concerning children with special educational needs.

Justice Secretary Ken Clarke announced the concessions in Parliament this week as he introduced the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill.

Clarke said he would retain the £100,000 equity disregard for homeowners, and that he had dropped a proposal to charge £100 where legal aid recipients had more than £1,000 in savings.

As revealed in the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) green paper last November, the bill removes legal aid from most family law matters, education law, housing (except where there is a threat of homelessness), personal injury, clinical negligence, employment, immigration (except for detention cases) and social welfare law.

The Legal Services Commission will be abolished, and its administrative duties passed to the holder of a new civil service role, the director of legal aid casework.

Justice minister Jonathan Djanogly said: “These reforms will ensure that we have a legal aid system which is targeted at those who need it most, in the most serious cases, as well as providing value for money to the taxpayer.”

The Bill also implements Lord Justice Jackson’s proposals on civil litigation costs.

However, legal aid lawyers accused the government of failing to listen to the public’s concerns. Legal aid practitioners group (LAPG) co-chair Jenny Beck said: "We are appalled that the government has not modified its response despite 5,000 responses to the consultation.

“The government has not listened. The proposals unravel the legal aid system. There will be very little access to justice for the poor. Once the organisations that perform this service are gone, they will never be replaced.”

Steve Hynes, director of the Legal Action Group (LAG), said legal advice agencies across the country faced potential closure due to funding cuts, and that both Birmingham and Ealing Borough faced cuts of more than £1m.

He said LAG had been “working behind the scenes” to try to secure a joint review between sector providers and the government on welfare law and alternative means of funding, but the government had not yet agreed. He speculated that Clarke may announce this next week to coincide with the second reading of the Bill.

Issue: 7471 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—Nathan Evans

Birketts—Nathan Evans

Commercial and technology team in Cambridge strengthened by partner hire

Andrew & Andrew Solicitors—Shikha Datta

Andrew & Andrew Solicitors—Shikha Datta

Hampshire firm appoints head of new family department

Latham & Watkins—Sarah Lightdale

Latham & Watkins—Sarah Lightdale

Firm strengthens securities practice with partner return

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll