header-logo header-logo

Clock starts on countdown to renting revolution

19 November 2025
Issue: 8140 / Categories: Legal News , Landlord&tenant , Property , Housing , Health & safety
printer mail-detail
Property lawyers have urged landlords to act quickly if they are considering regaining possession of their properties, ahead of major reforms to the private rental sector

The Renters’ Rights Act 2025 comes into force on 1 May 2026, ending fixed-term assured shorthold tenancies and abolishing section 21 ‘no fault’ possession—removing the fear landlords will evict if tenants complain about poor conditions. Instead, tenants will be able to give two months’ notice.

Esther Woolford, partner, and Sophie Kemp, associate, Clarke Willmott, said landlords can continue to serve section 21 notices until 1 May but time limits will apply, meaning most possession proceedings will have to be commenced within three months.

They advised landlords considering eviction to ‘act promptly.

‘Serving a section 21 notice now ensures that you can take advantage of the current regime and avoid being caught out by the new restrictions once the Act is fully in force’.

The Act creates a mandatory database for landlords and a Tenants’ Complaints Ombudsman, sets limits on rent increases and down-payments and prevents landlords from accepting offers above the advertised rent.

It will be illegal for landlords to discriminate against potential tenants on the basis they have children or claim benefits, and they will not be able to unreasonably refuse requests to keep pets. The Decent Homes Standard and ‘Awaab’s Law’, requiring timely action to tackle serious hazards such as dangerous levels of mould, will apply to the private rental sector.

Farriah Shams, associate, Hunters Law, said the Act’s success would depend on ‘balancing tenant protections with landlords’ confidence to continue offering homes for rent’.

The end of section 21 was ‘a significant step towards giving renters greater housing security,’ she said.

‘However, the reform is also controversial as the new rules could reduce rental supply or increase costs for renters.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Red Lion Chambers—Maurice MacSweeney

Red Lion Chambers—Maurice MacSweeney

Set creates new client and business development role amid growth

Kingsley Napley—Tim Lowles

Kingsley Napley—Tim Lowles

Sports disputes practice launchedwith partner appointment

mfg Solicitors—Tom Evans

mfg Solicitors—Tom Evans

Tax and succession planning offering expands with returning partner

NEWS
The rank of King’s Counsel (KC) has been awarded to 96 barristers, and no solicitors, in the latest silk round
Can a chief constable be held responsible for disobedient officers? Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth, professor of public law at De Montfort University, examines a Court of Appeal ruling that answers firmly: yes
Neurotechnology is poised to transform contract law—and unsettle it. Writing in NLJ this week, Harry Lambert, barrister at Outer Temple Chambers and founder of the Centre for Neurotechnology & Law, and Dr Michelle Sharpe, barrister at the Victorian Bar, explore how brain–computer interfaces could both prove and undermine consent
Comparators remain the fault line of discrimination law. In this week's NLJ, Anjali Malik, partner at Bellevue Law, and Mukhtiar Singh, barrister at Doughty Street Chambers, review a bumper year of appellate guidance clarifying how tribunals should approach ‘actual’ and ‘evidential’ comparators. A new six-stage framework stresses a simple starting point: identify the treatment first
In cross-border divorces, domicile can decide everything. In NLJ this week, Jennifer Headon, legal director and head of international family, Isobel Inkley, solicitor, and Fiona Collins, trainee solicitor, all at Birketts LLP, unpack a Court of Appeal ruling that re-centres nuance in jurisdiction disputes. The court held that once a domicile of choice is established, the burden lies on the party asserting its loss
back-to-top-scroll