header-logo header-logo

18 March 2025
Issue: 8109 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Technology
printer mail-detail

Closing the tech gap

Sir Geoffrey Vos, the Master of the Rolls has assigned the job of resolving legal uncertainties around digital assets and artificial intelligence (AI) liability to an expert group of judges, lawyers and regulators

Delivering the keynote speech to the 2025 UK Lawtech Conference last week, Sir Geoffrey, who chairs the UK Jurisdiction Taskforce (UKJT), said the taskforce will be starting work ‘immediately’ on its next three projects.

First, it will produce non-binding guidance on the concept of ‘control’ regarding digital assets. Second, it will provide a statement on redress for harms caused by AI—the taskforce has already issued three statements on the status of cryptoassets and smart contracts and the use of blockchain systems.

Sir Geoffrey said the fourth statement will be produced ‘with an eye to whether or not statutory intervention or underpinning is required.

‘The focus will be on harms caused to third parties and whether the existing law of torts can adequately respond’. He said the UKJT thinks there is ‘genuine market uncertainty’ about how and when developers of AI tools and those that use them might incur legal liability when things go wrong. Given the ‘multiple calls in the UK’ for more AI regulation and ‘for legislation to create new liabilities for its use. It would obviously be useful for government to have a reliable legal backdrop against which to consider those calls’.

The third project is to form an International Jurisdiction Taskforce (IJT), bringing together ‘legal thinkers in the digital space from the main private law jurisdictions around the world’. Sir Geoffrey said the idea ‘is to start the process of seeing whether some level of private law alignment can be achieved between the laws applicable in the most commonly chosen commercial jurisdictions. New York law, English law, Singapore law, Dubai law and French and German law might be a suitable starting point’.

Issue: 8109 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Technology
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
The legal profession’s claim to be a ‘guardian of fairness’ is under scrutiny after stark findings on gender imbalance and opaque progression. Writing in NLJ this week, Joshua Purser of No5 Barristers’ Chambers and Govindi Deerasinghe of Global 50/50 warn that leadership remains dominated by a narrow elite, with men holding 71% of top court roles
A legal challenge to police disclosure rules has failed, reinforcing a push for transparency in policing. In NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth examines a case where the Metropolitan Police required officers to declare membership of groups like the Freemasons
Bereavement leave is undergoing a quiet but profound transformation. Writing in NLJ this week, Robert Hargreaves of York St John University explains how the Employment Rights Act 2025 introduces a day-one right to leave for a wider range of losses, alongside new provisions for pregnancy loss and bereaved partners
Courts are beginning to grapple with whether AI-generated material is legally privileged—and the answers are mixed. In this week's issue of NLJ, Stacie Bourton, Tom Whittaker & Beata Kolodziej of Burges Salmon examine US rulings showing how easily privilege can be lost
New guidance seeks to bring order to the growing use of artificial intelligence (AI) in expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Minesh Tanna and David Bridge of Simmons & Simmons set out a framework stressing ‘transparency’, ‘explainability’ and ‘reliability’
back-to-top-scroll