header-logo header-logo

Closing the tech gap

18 March 2025
Issue: 8109 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Technology
printer mail-detail
Sir Geoffrey Vos, the Master of the Rolls has assigned the job of resolving legal uncertainties around digital assets and artificial intelligence (AI) liability to an expert group of judges, lawyers and regulators

Delivering the keynote speech to the 2025 UK Lawtech Conference last week, Sir Geoffrey, who chairs the UK Jurisdiction Taskforce (UKJT), said the taskforce will be starting work ‘immediately’ on its next three projects.

First, it will produce non-binding guidance on the concept of ‘control’ regarding digital assets. Second, it will provide a statement on redress for harms caused by AI—the taskforce has already issued three statements on the status of cryptoassets and smart contracts and the use of blockchain systems.

Sir Geoffrey said the fourth statement will be produced ‘with an eye to whether or not statutory intervention or underpinning is required.

‘The focus will be on harms caused to third parties and whether the existing law of torts can adequately respond’. He said the UKJT thinks there is ‘genuine market uncertainty’ about how and when developers of AI tools and those that use them might incur legal liability when things go wrong. Given the ‘multiple calls in the UK’ for more AI regulation and ‘for legislation to create new liabilities for its use. It would obviously be useful for government to have a reliable legal backdrop against which to consider those calls’.

The third project is to form an International Jurisdiction Taskforce (IJT), bringing together ‘legal thinkers in the digital space from the main private law jurisdictions around the world’. Sir Geoffrey said the idea ‘is to start the process of seeing whether some level of private law alignment can be achieved between the laws applicable in the most commonly chosen commercial jurisdictions. New York law, English law, Singapore law, Dubai law and French and German law might be a suitable starting point’.

Issue: 8109 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Technology
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Head of corporate promoted to director

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Firm strengthens international arbitration team with key London hire

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

FCA contentious financial regulation lawyer joins the team as of counsel

NEWS
Social media giants should face tortious liability for the psychological harms their platforms inflict, argues Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers in this week’s NLJ
The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024—once heralded as a breakthrough—has instead plunged leaseholders into confusion, warns Shabnam Ali-Khan of Russell-Cooke in this week’s NLJ
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has now confirmed that offering a disabled employee a trial period in an alternative role can itself be a 'reasonable adjustment' under the Equality Act 2010: in this week's NLJ, Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve analyses the evolving case law
Caroline Shea KC and Richard Miller of Falcon Chambers examine the growing judicial focus on 'cynical breach' in restrictive covenant cases, in this week's issue of NLJ
Ian Gascoigne of LexisNexis dissects the uneasy balance between open justice and confidentiality in England’s civil courts, in this week's NLJ. From public hearings to super-injunctions, he identifies five tiers of privacy—from fully open proceedings to entirely secret ones—showing how a patchwork of exceptions has evolved without clear design
back-to-top-scroll