header-logo header-logo

27 October 2016 / Jonathan Goodliffe
Issue: 7720 / Categories: Opinion , Profession
printer mail-detail

The co-morbid lawyer

nlj_7720_goodeliffe

Alcoholism & depression can be a lethal combination within the profession, Jonathan Goodliffe reports

Lawyers often suffer from co-morbid alcoholism and depression. What help do they get in the profession?

A disciplinary case

X is a solicitor who has had serious problems. He was convicted of a sexual assault and fined by the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal. Several years later he was convicted of further assaults on two girls. He believed, wrongly, that they had harmed his daughter. On both occasions he was drunk. The second time he was fined £5,000 by the tribunal, but was not restricted from practising.

X’s psychiatrist report stated: “[I]n all the circumstances X’s action [ie the assault] had been ‘a totally understandable reaction’. X had sought psychiatric help for reactive depression.”

So why should he not behave in this way a third time? Did his impairment affect his professional competence and integrity? What was the prognosis? What ongoing treatment was he receiving? What about his drinking?

Problems with alcohol and depression regularly feature in the tribunal’s judgments. But the tribunal’s procedure

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ward Hadaway—19 promotions

Ward Hadaway—19 promotions

19 promotions across national offices, including two new partners

Brabners—Ruth Hargreaves

Brabners—Ruth Hargreaves

Partner promoted to head of corporate team

Slater Heelis—Liam Hall, Jordan Bear & Joe Madigan

Slater Heelis—Liam Hall, Jordan Bear & Joe Madigan

Chester office expansion accelerates with triple appointment

NEWS
As AI chatbots increasingly provide legal and commercial advice, English law is beginning to confront who should bear responsibility when automated systems get things wrong
Businesses are facing a ‘dramatic rise in prosecution risks’ as sweeping reforms to corporate criminal liability come into force, expanding the net of who can be held responsible for wrongdoing inside organisations
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has reignited debate over what exactly counts as the ‘conduct of litigation’ in modern legal practice
A controversial High Court financial remedies ruling has reignited debate over secrecy, non-disclosure and fairness in divorce proceedings involving hidden wealth
Britain’s deferred prosecution agreement regime is undergoing a significant shift, with prosecutors placing renewed emphasis on corporate cooperation, reform and early self-reporting
back-to-top-scroll