header-logo header-logo

02 March 2018 / Jonathan Cornthwaite
Issue: 7783 / Categories: Features , Intellectual property
printer mail-detail

Collaboration aggravation

nlj_7783_cornthwaite

Jonathan Cornthwaite navigates through the minefield that is copyright disputes

  • Drawing the line between the rights of those who contribute —in different ways, and in different degrees—to the making of a copyright work.

If you were to embark upon writing a novel, it is rather unlikely that you would invite anyone else to join you in the task. But in many other areas of creative activity, collaboration between two or more participants is very normal. And, furthermore, it can be hugely fruitful: in the field of popular song alone, for example, one thinks of George and Ira Gershwin, Rodgers and Hammerstein, Elton John and Bernie Taupin …and of course Lennon and McCartney.

But if collaboration can often be very beneficial from a creative standpoint, it can be an absolute minefield from the legal perspective. Indeed, one of the highest-profile copyright wrangles to have perplexed the English courts in recent years was on the subject of the respective rights of those who contributed to the composition of A Whiter Shade of Pale, one

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Jonathan Askin

Hugh James—Jonathan Askin

London corporate and commercial team announces partner appointment

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Firm names partner as London office managing partner

Kingsley Napley—Jonathan Grimes

Kingsley Napley—Jonathan Grimes

Firm appoints new head of criminal litigation team

NEWS
Personal injury lawyers have welcomed a government U-turn on a ‘substantial prejudice’ defence that risked enabling defendants in child sexual abuse civil cases to have proceedings against them dropped
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
back-to-top-scroll