header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

Company—Administration—Client funds

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
08 March 2012
Issue: 7504 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Re Lehman Brothers International (Europe) (in administration) [2012] UKSC 6, [2012] All ER (D) 193 (Feb)

Supreme Court, Lord Hope DP, Lord Walker, Lord Clarke, Lord Dyson, Lord Collins SCJJ, 29 Feb 2012

Client money is held on the statutory trust imposed by Chapter 7 of the Client Assets Sourcebook (CASS 7), issued by the Financial Services Authority (FSA), 7.7, from the time of receipt by a firm.

Lehman Brothers International (Europe) (LBIE) was incorporated in England as an unlimited company. It was the principal European trading company in the Lehman Brothers group and was authorised and regulated by the FSA. LBIE was not a licensed deposit-taker but it was authorised to hold clients’ money. LBIE was put into administration by an order of Henderson J made in September 2008. The administrators made several applications to the Companies Court for directions under para 63 of Sch B1 to the Insolvency Act 1986. One of those was a client money application. Nine representative claimants were joined as parties to argue the issues.

In December 2009, Briggs

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Taylor Rose—nine promotions

Taylor Rose—nine promotions

Leadership strengthened across core practice areas with nine new partners

Fieldfisher—Rebecca Maxwell

Fieldfisher—Rebecca Maxwell

Real estate team welcomes partner inBirmingham

Ward Hadaway—14 trainee solicitors

Ward Hadaway—14 trainee solicitors

Firm strengthens commitment to nurturing future legal talent

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: AI, liberty & the digital cage
Government plans for offender ‘restriction zones’ risk creating ‘digital cages’ that blur punishment with surveillance, warns Henrietta Ronson, partner at Corker Binning, in this week's issue of NLJ
NLJ this week: Leasehold reform in limbo
Louise Uphill, senior associate at Moore Barlow LLP, dissects the faltering rollout of the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Enforcement reform gets real
Judgments are ‘worthless without enforcement’, says HHJ Karen Walden-Smith, senior circuit judge and chair of the Civil Justice Council’s enforcement working group. In this week's NLJ, she breaks down the CJC’s April 2025 report, which identified systemic flaws and proposed 39 reforms, from modernising procedures to protecting vulnerable debtors
NLJ this week: Standish reshapes family & inheritance claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Katherine Harding and Charlotte Finley of Penningtons Manches Cooper examine Standish v Standish [2025] UKSC 26, the Supreme Court ruling that narrowed what counts as matrimonial property, and its potential impact upon claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975
NLJ this week: Clearing Christine Keeler’s name
In this week's NLJ, Dr Jon Robins, editor of The Justice Gap and lecturer at Brighton University, reports on a campaign to posthumously exonerate Christine Keeler. 60 years after her perjury conviction, Keeler’s son Seymour Platt has petitioned the king to exercise the royal prerogative of mercy, arguing she was a victim of violence and moral hypocrisy, not deceit. Supported by Felicity Gerry KC, the dossier brands the conviction 'the ultimate in slut-shaming'
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll