header-logo header-logo

Company law

06 January 2011
Issue: 7447 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Lomas and others v JFB Firth Rixson Inc and other companies [2010] EWHC 3372 (Ch), [2010] All ER (D) 248 (Dec)

The International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) master agreement was one of the most widely used forms of standard market agreement used in the financial world. It was axiomatic that it should, as far as possible, be interpreted in a way that served the objectives of clarity, certainty and predictability, so that the very large number of parties using it should know where they stood.

Nonetheless, the master agreement did not ordinarily constitute the entirety of the parties’ bargain in relation to a particular transaction. Each transaction was regulated by specific terms in the schedule and the confirmation which prevailed over the master agreement in the event of any inconsistency.

The process of implication was not something separate and distinct from construction. It was part of the process which arose when the instrument did not expressly provide for what was to happen when some event occurred.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hill Dickinson—Paul Matthews, Liz Graham & Sarah Pace

Hill Dickinson—Paul Matthews, Liz Graham & Sarah Pace

Leeds office strengthened with triple partner hire

Clarke Willmott—Oksana Howard

Clarke Willmott—Oksana Howard

Corporate lawyer joins as partner in London office

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll