header-logo header-logo

06 January 2011
Issue: 7447 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Company law

Lomas and others v JFB Firth Rixson Inc and other companies [2010] EWHC 3372 (Ch), [2010] All ER (D) 248 (Dec)

The International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) master agreement was one of the most widely used forms of standard market agreement used in the financial world. It was axiomatic that it should, as far as possible, be interpreted in a way that served the objectives of clarity, certainty and predictability, so that the very large number of parties using it should know where they stood.

Nonetheless, the master agreement did not ordinarily constitute the entirety of the parties’ bargain in relation to a particular transaction. Each transaction was regulated by specific terms in the schedule and the confirmation which prevailed over the master agreement in the event of any inconsistency.

The process of implication was not something separate and distinct from construction. It was part of the process which arose when the instrument did not expressly provide for what was to happen when some event occurred.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll