header-logo header-logo

19 July 2007
Issue: 7282 / Categories: Legal News , Damages , Employment
printer mail-detail

Compensation advances for ailing miners

News

Sick miners who were given inadequate professional services by their lawyers in relation to the British Coal compensation scheme are to be paid up to £100,000 by the Law Society.

The society agreed to fork out the ex gratia advance of awards after several of the solicitors accused of providing a shoddy service deferred payment pending a hearing before the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT).
Des Hudson, Law Society chief executive, says: “One or two solicitors’ firms have deferred payment pending a hearing before the SDT. While solicitors may argue at the SDT that the award is wrong, we are concerned that miners should not be disadvantaged by the delay the hearing inevitably creates.
“This currently affects only around 40 miners, but we are conscious that most of those involved are elderly and infirm so the Law Society has decided to make the payment itself to shortcut the process.”

Under the current law these awards only become enforceable after the matter has been referred to the SDT and the SDT has ordered the solicitors to pay. The Solicitors Regulation Authority will still seek to enforce the award against the solicitors concerned in the normal way.
The society’s pledge comes after Glyn Maddocks, a society council member and a partner at Gabb and Co, admitted five breaches of professional rules in relation to his dealings with the coal miners’ compensation scheme. He was fined £15,000 at the SDT and ordered to pay the costs, estimated to be £60,000.

Issue: 7282 / Categories: Legal News , Damages , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
back-to-top-scroll