header-logo header-logo

19 July 2007
Issue: 7282 / Categories: Legal News , Damages , Employment
printer mail-detail

Compensation advances for ailing miners

News

Sick miners who were given inadequate professional services by their lawyers in relation to the British Coal compensation scheme are to be paid up to £100,000 by the Law Society.

The society agreed to fork out the ex gratia advance of awards after several of the solicitors accused of providing a shoddy service deferred payment pending a hearing before the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT).
Des Hudson, Law Society chief executive, says: “One or two solicitors’ firms have deferred payment pending a hearing before the SDT. While solicitors may argue at the SDT that the award is wrong, we are concerned that miners should not be disadvantaged by the delay the hearing inevitably creates.
“This currently affects only around 40 miners, but we are conscious that most of those involved are elderly and infirm so the Law Society has decided to make the payment itself to shortcut the process.”

Under the current law these awards only become enforceable after the matter has been referred to the SDT and the SDT has ordered the solicitors to pay. The Solicitors Regulation Authority will still seek to enforce the award against the solicitors concerned in the normal way.
The society’s pledge comes after Glyn Maddocks, a society council member and a partner at Gabb and Co, admitted five breaches of professional rules in relation to his dealings with the coal miners’ compensation scheme. He was fined £15,000 at the SDT and ordered to pay the costs, estimated to be £60,000.

Issue: 7282 / Categories: Legal News , Damages , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll