header-logo header-logo

Compensation fund out for consultation

24 January 2020
Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail
Proposals to cap the solicitors’ compensation fund to £500,000 for single claims have been put forward in a 12-week consultation

Related claims would also be subject to a cap. The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) also want to drop proposals for the introduction of a hardship test.

The compensation fund protects clients who lose money due to dishonesty by a solicitor, or in circumstances where they cannot claim on a law firm’s professional indemnity insurance.

The changes are based on an earlier consultation in 2018 on both professional indemnity insurance arrangements and how the fund is managed.

The SRA would focus eligibility criteria on people most in need of protection, remove hardship tests, restrict applications to recipients of legal services from the solicitor involved, cap single claims to £500,000, cap the total amount for related claims, and bar claims where an insurance policy has been voided or has already paid out.

Paul Philip, SRA Chief Executive, said: ‘The Compensation Fund provides an essential safety net for those who need it, helping to maintain trust in the profession when things go wrong.

‘However, funding the scheme comes at a cost, which is borne by the wider profession and ultimately their clients. We have seen how significant risks in the market over recent years, including solicitor involvement in dubious investment schemes, have affected the Fund and contributions from the profession.

‘We want to strike the right balance between protecting clients’ money and making sure that the Fund remains sustainable for the future.’

The consultation, ‘Compensation fund reform’, ends on 21 April.

Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Partner hire bolstersprivate capital and global aviation finance offering

Morae—Carla Mendy

Morae—Carla Mendy

Digital and business solutions firm appoints chief operating officer

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Set welcomes two experienced juniors as new tenants

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll