header-logo header-logo

Compensation fund out for consultation

24 January 2020
Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail
Proposals to cap the solicitors’ compensation fund to £500,000 for single claims have been put forward in a 12-week consultation

Related claims would also be subject to a cap. The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) also want to drop proposals for the introduction of a hardship test.

The compensation fund protects clients who lose money due to dishonesty by a solicitor, or in circumstances where they cannot claim on a law firm’s professional indemnity insurance.

The changes are based on an earlier consultation in 2018 on both professional indemnity insurance arrangements and how the fund is managed.

The SRA would focus eligibility criteria on people most in need of protection, remove hardship tests, restrict applications to recipients of legal services from the solicitor involved, cap single claims to £500,000, cap the total amount for related claims, and bar claims where an insurance policy has been voided or has already paid out.

Paul Philip, SRA Chief Executive, said: ‘The Compensation Fund provides an essential safety net for those who need it, helping to maintain trust in the profession when things go wrong.

‘However, funding the scheme comes at a cost, which is borne by the wider profession and ultimately their clients. We have seen how significant risks in the market over recent years, including solicitor involvement in dubious investment schemes, have affected the Fund and contributions from the profession.

‘We want to strike the right balance between protecting clients’ money and making sure that the Fund remains sustainable for the future.’

The consultation, ‘Compensation fund reform’, ends on 21 April.

Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Nigel Adams & Rehman Noormohamed

Weightmans—Nigel Adams & Rehman Noormohamed

Insurance and corporate teams in London announce double partner hire

Fieldfisher—Chris Cartmell

Fieldfisher—Chris Cartmell

Technology and data practice bolstered by partner hire

South Square—Tony Beswetherick KC

South Square—Tony Beswetherick KC

Set strengthens civil fraud and insolvency offering with new member

NEWS
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
The long-awaited Getty Images v Stability AI judgment arrived at the end of last year—but not with the seismic impact many expected. In this week's issue of NLJ, experts from Arnold & Porter dissect a ruling that is ‘historic’ yet tightly confined
back-to-top-scroll