header-logo header-logo

24 January 2020
Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Compensation fund out for consultation

Proposals to cap the solicitors’ compensation fund to £500,000 for single claims have been put forward in a 12-week consultation

Related claims would also be subject to a cap. The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) also want to drop proposals for the introduction of a hardship test.

The compensation fund protects clients who lose money due to dishonesty by a solicitor, or in circumstances where they cannot claim on a law firm’s professional indemnity insurance.

The changes are based on an earlier consultation in 2018 on both professional indemnity insurance arrangements and how the fund is managed.

The SRA would focus eligibility criteria on people most in need of protection, remove hardship tests, restrict applications to recipients of legal services from the solicitor involved, cap single claims to £500,000, cap the total amount for related claims, and bar claims where an insurance policy has been voided or has already paid out.

Paul Philip, SRA Chief Executive, said: ‘The Compensation Fund provides an essential safety net for those who need it, helping to maintain trust in the profession when things go wrong.

‘However, funding the scheme comes at a cost, which is borne by the wider profession and ultimately their clients. We have seen how significant risks in the market over recent years, including solicitor involvement in dubious investment schemes, have affected the Fund and contributions from the profession.

‘We want to strike the right balance between protecting clients’ money and making sure that the Fund remains sustainable for the future.’

The consultation, ‘Compensation fund reform’, ends on 21 April.

Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
back-to-top-scroll