header-logo header-logo

Compensation fund out for consultation

24 January 2020
Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail
Proposals to cap the solicitors’ compensation fund to £500,000 for single claims have been put forward in a 12-week consultation

Related claims would also be subject to a cap. The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) also want to drop proposals for the introduction of a hardship test.

The compensation fund protects clients who lose money due to dishonesty by a solicitor, or in circumstances where they cannot claim on a law firm’s professional indemnity insurance.

The changes are based on an earlier consultation in 2018 on both professional indemnity insurance arrangements and how the fund is managed.

The SRA would focus eligibility criteria on people most in need of protection, remove hardship tests, restrict applications to recipients of legal services from the solicitor involved, cap single claims to £500,000, cap the total amount for related claims, and bar claims where an insurance policy has been voided or has already paid out.

Paul Philip, SRA Chief Executive, said: ‘The Compensation Fund provides an essential safety net for those who need it, helping to maintain trust in the profession when things go wrong.

‘However, funding the scheme comes at a cost, which is borne by the wider profession and ultimately their clients. We have seen how significant risks in the market over recent years, including solicitor involvement in dubious investment schemes, have affected the Fund and contributions from the profession.

‘We want to strike the right balance between protecting clients’ money and making sure that the Fund remains sustainable for the future.’

The consultation, ‘Compensation fund reform’, ends on 21 April.

Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll