header-logo header-logo

29 July 2016
Issue: 7709 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Competition

Gallaher Group Ltd and another v Competition and Markets Authority [2016] EWCA Civ 719, [2016] All ER (D) 83 (Jul)

The Court of Appeal allowed the claimants’ appeal against refusal of their judicial review challenge of two decisions made by the defendant’s predecessor, the Office of Fair Trading (OFT). There had been a plain breach of the principle of equal treatment and fairness in the OFT’s decisions to have given, and acted upon, assurances to another company that, if it entered into an early resolution agreement, it would receive the benefit of any successful appeal by other companies being investigated without itself having to appeal. That unequal treatment had not been objectively justified.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll