header-logo header-logo

29 July 2016
Issue: 7709 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Competition

Gallaher Group Ltd and another v Competition and Markets Authority [2016] EWCA Civ 719, [2016] All ER (D) 83 (Jul)

The Court of Appeal allowed the claimants’ appeal against refusal of their judicial review challenge of two decisions made by the defendant’s predecessor, the Office of Fair Trading (OFT). There had been a plain breach of the principle of equal treatment and fairness in the OFT’s decisions to have given, and acted upon, assurances to another company that, if it entered into an early resolution agreement, it would receive the benefit of any successful appeal by other companies being investigated without itself having to appeal. That unequal treatment had not been objectively justified.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Fieldfisher—Will Sharp

Fieldfisher—Will Sharp

Fieldfisher boosts structured finance practice with appointment of Will Sharp

gunnercooke—Thomas Bjorn & Peter Rudd-Clarke

gunnercooke—Thomas Bjorn & Peter Rudd-Clarke

gunnercooke grows its life sciences team with new partner hires

Leonard Curtis Legal—Mark Maguire & Kane Jones

Leonard Curtis Legal—Mark Maguire & Kane Jones

Leonard Curtis Legal expands corporate team with twonew appointments

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
back-to-top-scroll