header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
28 April 2021 / Dr Jing Wang
Issue: 7930 / Categories: Features , Competition , Commercial , Technology
printer mail-detail

Competition law & e-commerce: change is coming?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
47590
Restoring competition in the digital market is essential for enhancing consumers’ confidence in e-commerce, says Dr Jing Wang
  • The Competition and Markets Authority’s decision on ComparetheMarket.com’s breach of anti-competitive activities.
  • Wide ‘most-favoured nation’ (MFN) clauses and narrow MFN clauses.

‘Price comparison websites are excellent for consumers. They promote competition between providers, offer choice for customers, and make it easier for consumers to find the best bargains’: Michael Grenfell, the Competition and Markets Authority’s (CMA) executive director for enforcement.

However, price comparison websites can also go in the opposite direction, which is what we witnessed in the case of dominant price website ComparetheMarket.com (part of the BGL Group). The UK CMA fined BGL (BGL (Holdings) Limited, BGL Group Ltd, BISL Ltd and Compare the Market Ltd) over £17.9m in November last year for breaching UK competition law by price-fixing and restricting competition in a thoroughly intriguing fashion. Instead of promoting competition in the insurance quote markets, ComparetheMarket.com was found to have restricted competition by imposing wide ‘most-favoured

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: No such thing as a ‘Welsh seat’
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
NLJ this week: Jury reform risks justice for efficiency’s sake
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
NLJ this week: Crypto fightback offers ‘new frontier for law’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
NLJ this week: Time to revive the duty to report crime?
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
NLJ this week: When are experts truly ‘necessary’?
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll