header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
15 October 2010
Issue: 7437 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Confidential information—Injunction against disclosure of information—Interim injunction

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

British Broadcasting Corporation v HarperCollins Ltd and others [2010] EWHC 2424 (Ch), [2010] All ER (D) 08 (Oct)

Confidential information—Injunction against disclosure of information—Interim injunction

British Broadcasting Corporation v HarperCollins Ltd and others [2010] EWHC 2424 (Ch), [2010] All ER (D) 08 (Oct)

Chancery Division, Morgan J, 4 October 2010

In refusing to grant an injunction preventing the actor who played “The Stig” on the well known programme Top Gear from publication of his autobiography and thereby revealing his identity, the court has found that as the information was already in the public domain there was no basis for an injunction based on confidentiality.

Richard Spearman QC and Jonathan Barnes (instructed by Alexis Hawkes, BBC litigation department) for the BBC. Hugh Tomlinson QC and Laura Prince (instructed by Davenport Lyons) for the publishers. Hugh Tomlinson QC and Laura Prince (instructed by Clarke Willmott LLP) for Mr Collins and the service company.

The claimant broadcast a well known and successful television programme called Top Gear. Since 2002, a character called “The Stig” appeared

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: When post-breach events rewrite damages claims
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
NLJ this week: Supreme Court redraws unfair prejudice rules
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
NLJ this week: ‘Joe Donor’ ruling exposes dangers of unregulated conception
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: CILEX warns Mazur ruling must spark reform
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Conditional job offers carry hidden risks for employers
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll