header-logo header-logo

17 November 2023 / Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC
Issue: 8049 / Categories: Features , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Conflict between government & judges is not new

146609
Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC looks back to the feud of Bacon & Coke

Francis Bacon and Edward Coke were the two legal giants of the late 16th and early 17th century. Both achieved high judicial office, Bacon as Lord Chancellor, Coke as Lord Chief Justice, but their views were diametrically opposed on the supremacy of the law and the authority of the Crown. Their conflict is the subject of a recent novel, The Winding Stair, by Jesse Norman, Conservative MP and former minister.

Coke was the legal scholar, wedded to the common law and the primacy of the judges. Bacon had a wider perspective. He favoured the monarchy, which at the time wielded executive authority. For him the judges were ‘lions under the throne’—powerful but subordinate. Parliament only attained its modern status after the ‘glorious revolution’ of 1689 reduced the Crown to a secondary and ultimately nominal role in government. With that difference the current tension between government and the judges parallels its precursor almost

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll