header-logo header-logo

17 November 2023 / Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC
Issue: 8049 / Categories: Features , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Conflict between government & judges is not new

146609
Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC looks back to the feud of Bacon & Coke

Francis Bacon and Edward Coke were the two legal giants of the late 16th and early 17th century. Both achieved high judicial office, Bacon as Lord Chancellor, Coke as Lord Chief Justice, but their views were diametrically opposed on the supremacy of the law and the authority of the Crown. Their conflict is the subject of a recent novel, The Winding Stair, by Jesse Norman, Conservative MP and former minister.

Coke was the legal scholar, wedded to the common law and the primacy of the judges. Bacon had a wider perspective. He favoured the monarchy, which at the time wielded executive authority. For him the judges were ‘lions under the throne’—powerful but subordinate. Parliament only attained its modern status after the ‘glorious revolution’ of 1689 reduced the Crown to a secondary and ultimately nominal role in government. With that difference the current tension between government and the judges parallels its precursor almost

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

McCarthy Denning—Harvey Knight & Martin Sandler

McCarthy Denning—Harvey Knight & Martin Sandler

Financial services and regulatory offering boosted by partner hires

NEWS
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
back-to-top-scroll