header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
12 April 2024 / C Haward Soper
Issue: 8066 / Categories: Features , Profession , Contract , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Consequential loss: searching for the meaning

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
167816
What’s the true meaning of ‘consequential loss’? C Haward Soper consults the case law—and that other authoritative source, ChatGPT…
  • Considers what commercial professionals mean by the term ‘consequential loss’ and provides a summary of relevant case law.
  • Compares these definitions with those given as a result of entering prompts into ChatGPT, showing that AI’s usefulness in this area is limited for now.

All contract professionals will be aware of—and perhaps scared of—consequential loss. It’s a matter of interest to any lawyer engaged in the drafting of indemnities or exclusion clauses, whether in general commercial contracts or in mergers and acquisitions.

To help clarify the meaning of the term, I have consulted the relevant case law—and enlisted the help of an expert, ChatGPT, for advice. According to CBS News, one lawyer used ChatGPT last year to prepare for a court hearing. It went horribly awry, with ChatGPT inventing ‘court cases that didn’t exist’. My experiments in AI also show that its usefulness is limited.

Precise limitation

Why

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Osbornes Law—Alex McMahon, Andrew Middlehurst & Harriet McMorrin

Osbornes Law—Alex McMahon, Andrew Middlehurst & Harriet McMorrin

Homegrown hat-trick: Osbornes Law promotes three former trainees to partner

mfg Solicitors—Sarah Bradford

mfg Solicitors—Sarah Bradford

Partner arrival boosts law firm’s growing real estate team

Freeths—David Smith

Freeths—David Smith

Freeths secures major tax hire with appointment of David Smith

NEWS
Read All
Good faith test is objective, rules Supreme Court
The Supreme Court has clarified the scope of a director’s duty, in a case where a chairman’s good intentions went awry due to the pandemic
Fisher review urges tough action on digital fraud
Digital fraud is ‘baffling policymakers, investigators, prosecutors and enforcers’, leaving ‘a massive justice gap’, the author of a government-commissioned independent review has warned
Regulatory overseer must do better
Richard Lloyd’s independent review of the Legal Services Board (LSB) has delivered a devastating verdict, accusing the super-regulator of having ‘lost its way in recent years’
Hillsborough Law imposes duty of candour
The House of Commons has passed the Hillsborough Law, in a historic achievement for campaigners, survivors and families of those who died in the 1989 stadium collapse
Judging statistics show mixed bag on diversity progress
Judicial statistics show a steady rise in the number of female judges and Asian and mixed ethnicity judges in the past ten years—however, progress in terms of representation has stalled for both Black lawyers and for solicitors
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll