header-logo header-logo

Conspiracy theories

16 August 2016 / Simon Duncan
Issue: 7712 / Categories: Features , Banking , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Simon Duncan follows the latest drama surrounding swaps mis-selling in Hockin and Others v RBS plc

Mr and Mrs Hockin’s company, London & West Country Estates Limited (LWE) owned and managed commercial business parks in Somerset and Devon. In 2008, LWE entered into an interest rate swap with Royal Bank of Scotland Plc (RBS). LWE swapped a fixed rate of interest for a floating rate just prior to the collapse of the base rate to 0.5% in 2009. In October 2009 LWE was placed into the bank’s global restructuring group (GRG). LWE is now in liquidation.

The Hockins believe that LWE was “mis-sold” the interest rate swap. This label refers to a collection of different causes of action. Here, described as an advisory claim, a swap misrepresentation claim, a “LIBOR” claim, and the “GRG” claim. Mr Hockin broke new ground in 2014 when he successfully persuaded the High Court that the then administrators of LWE be obliged to effect an assignment of these claims to him, pursuant to Sch B1 of the Insolvency Act 1986,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll