header-logo header-logo

03 July 2008 / Khawar Qureshi KC
Issue: 7328 / Categories: Features , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Constitutional renewal or re-packaging?

Khawar Qureshi QC considers the changing role of the attorney general

In the aftermath of the controversy generated in the past five years concerning the attorney general's (AG) opinion which was used to provide legal cover for the invasion of Iraq in March 2003, the role of the AG in the termination of the BAE investigation in December 2006, and last year, the “cash for honours” issue, public confidence in the office of the AG is seen by many to have plummeted.

To his credit, the new Prime Minister, Gordon Brown announced within days of taking office in June 2007 that:

        “…the role of the attorney general, which combines legal and ministerial functions, needs to change. While we consult on reform, the attorney general has herself decided, except if the law or national security requires it, not to make key prosecution decisions in individual criminal cases”.

This was soon followed by a consultation paper entitled The Governance of Britain —A Consultation on the Role of the Attorney General (the Consultation Paper).

In

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll