header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
03 July 2008 / Khawar Qureshi KC
Issue: 7328 / Categories: Features , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Constitutional renewal or re-packaging?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Khawar Qureshi QC considers the changing role of the attorney general

In the aftermath of the controversy generated in the past five years concerning the attorney general's (AG) opinion which was used to provide legal cover for the invasion of Iraq in March 2003, the role of the AG in the termination of the BAE investigation in December 2006, and last year, the “cash for honours” issue, public confidence in the office of the AG is seen by many to have plummeted.

To his credit, the new Prime Minister, Gordon Brown announced within days of taking office in June 2007 that:

        “…the role of the attorney general, which combines legal and ministerial functions, needs to change. While we consult on reform, the attorney general has herself decided, except if the law or national security requires it, not to make key prosecution decisions in individual criminal cases”.

This was soon followed by a consultation paper entitled The Governance of Britain —A Consultation on the Role of the Attorney General (the Consultation Paper).

In

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll