header-logo header-logo

Consumers at risk in large claims

01 September 2025
Issue: 8129 / Categories: Legal News , Regulatory , Legal services , Consumer
printer mail-detail
Law firms are failing to protect clients’ best interests in high-volume no-win no-fee claims, regulators have warned

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) reported evidence of poor practice at several firms handling claims such as mis-selling of financial products, flight delays and data breaches, in its ‘High-volume consumer claims thematic review’.

The SRA has now taken the unusual step of requiring firms to complete a mandatory declaration confirming they understand and follow its rules. 

Its review, published in August, found evidence of firms not being transparent on costs, potential liabilities, merits, funding and referral fees.

Of 50 files reviewed, for example, 11 lacked client identity checks and 39 lacked sanctions checks. At one firm, the files contained no evidence that clients had given written consent to the firm’s retainer.

Clients were given no opportunity to read information about the after-the-event (ATE) cover they were taking out, in ten out of 23 ATE files reviewed.

For the review, it surveyed 129 high-volume claims firms—of 25 firms visited for in-depth inspection, only 11 could show they shared the required care information with all claimants and only 12 had records proving they did so regarding costs and funding. Consequently, the SRA is now investigating nine of the 25 visited.

As of the end of July, the SRA had 95 investigations for potential misconduct in high-volume claims work open on 76 law firms.

SRA chair Anna Bradley said: ‘There are widespread issues in the market, and this is harming consumers.

‘Where we see poor practice, we will take robust action.’

Welcoming the review, Law Society president Richard Atkinson said regulation must be ‘effective, balanced and targeted at safeguarding vulnerable consumers’.

Concerns about high-volume claims firms have escalated in the past 18 months after insurers pursued SSB Group clients for adverse costs for discontinued cavity wall insulation claims.

Issue: 8129 / Categories: Legal News , Regulatory , Legal services , Consumer
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Mourant—Stephen Alexander

Mourant—Stephen Alexander

Jersey litigation lead appointed to global STEP Council

mfg Solicitors—nine trainees

mfg Solicitors—nine trainees

Firm invests in future talent with new training cohort

360 Law Group—Anthony Gahan

360 Law Group—Anthony Gahan

Investment banking veteran appointed as chairman to drive global growth

NEWS
Artificial intelligence may be revolutionising the law, but its misuse could wreck cases and careers, warns Clare Arthurs of Penningtons Manches Cooper in this week's NLJ
Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre makes the case for ‘General Practice Pro Bono’—using core legal skills to deliver life-changing support, without the need for niche expertise—in this week's NLJ
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve reports on Haynes v Thomson, the first judicial application of the Supreme Court’s For Women Scotland ruling in a discrimination claim, in this week's NLJ
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
back-to-top-scroll