header-logo header-logo

Consumers at risk in large claims

01 September 2025
Issue: 8129 / Categories: Legal News , Regulatory , Legal services , Consumer
printer mail-detail
Law firms are failing to protect clients’ best interests in high-volume no-win no-fee claims, regulators have warned

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) reported evidence of poor practice at several firms handling claims such as mis-selling of financial products, flight delays and data breaches, in its ‘High-volume consumer claims thematic review’.

The SRA has now taken the unusual step of requiring firms to complete a mandatory declaration confirming they understand and follow its rules. 

Its review, published in August, found evidence of firms not being transparent on costs, potential liabilities, merits, funding and referral fees.

Of 50 files reviewed, for example, 11 lacked client identity checks and 39 lacked sanctions checks. At one firm, the files contained no evidence that clients had given written consent to the firm’s retainer.

Clients were given no opportunity to read information about the after-the-event (ATE) cover they were taking out, in ten out of 23 ATE files reviewed.

For the review, it surveyed 129 high-volume claims firms—of 25 firms visited for in-depth inspection, only 11 could show they shared the required care information with all claimants and only 12 had records proving they did so regarding costs and funding. Consequently, the SRA is now investigating nine of the 25 visited.

As of the end of July, the SRA had 95 investigations for potential misconduct in high-volume claims work open on 76 law firms.

SRA chair Anna Bradley said: ‘There are widespread issues in the market, and this is harming consumers.

‘Where we see poor practice, we will take robust action.’

Welcoming the review, Law Society president Richard Atkinson said regulation must be ‘effective, balanced and targeted at safeguarding vulnerable consumers’.

Concerns about high-volume claims firms have escalated in the past 18 months after insurers pursued SSB Group clients for adverse costs for discontinued cavity wall insulation claims.

Issue: 8129 / Categories: Legal News , Regulatory , Legal services , Consumer
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Writing in NLJ this week, Thomas Rothwell and Kavish Shah of Falcon Chambers unpack the surprise inclusion of a ban on upwards-only rent reviews in the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll