header-logo header-logo

Contemplating relocation

Sinclair Cramsie & Clare Harrington unravel the complexities of relocating TUPE transferees

It is not uncommon for a business to take over a local competitor in order to acquire the competitor’s business and workforce but not its premises. The outcome in the case of Tapere v South London and Maudsley NHS Trust ET Case No. 2329562/2007 has left many employers questioning their approach in situations where they require a newly-acquired business and workforce to move—on some occasions, a relatively modest distance. The Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/246) (TUPE) provide a clear route for employees unwilling to make such a move to claim automatic unfair dismissal. The opportunities for successfully defending such a claim appear to be limited. 

Contract transfer

Ms Tapere was employed by Lewisham Primary Care Trust, based at Burgess Park in Camberwell. Her contract of employment was transferred by virtue of TUPE to the South London and Maudsley NHS Trust. It was anticipated, both by the transferee and transferor, that the claimant’s place of work

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll