header-logo header-logo

Contemplating relocation

Sinclair Cramsie & Clare Harrington unravel the complexities of relocating TUPE transferees

It is not uncommon for a business to take over a local competitor in order to acquire the competitor’s business and workforce but not its premises. The outcome in the case of Tapere v South London and Maudsley NHS Trust ET Case No. 2329562/2007 has left many employers questioning their approach in situations where they require a newly-acquired business and workforce to move—on some occasions, a relatively modest distance. The Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/246) (TUPE) provide a clear route for employees unwilling to make such a move to claim automatic unfair dismissal. The opportunities for successfully defending such a claim appear to be limited. 

Contract transfer

Ms Tapere was employed by Lewisham Primary Care Trust, based at Burgess Park in Camberwell. Her contract of employment was transferred by virtue of TUPE to the South London and Maudsley NHS Trust. It was anticipated, both by the transferee and transferor, that the claimant’s place of work

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll