header-logo header-logo

17 May 2012
Issue: 7514 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Contempt

R v OB [2012] EWCA Crim 67, [2012] All ER (D) 67 (May)

 

It was established law that the scope of the United States Extradition Treaty 2003 (the treaty) was confined to criminal offences and that civil contempt was not a criminal offence. The rule of specialty embodied in art 18 of the treaty had nothing to do with civil matters. That civil contempt might in fact result in punishment by way of committal to prison did not make it any the less a civil matter.
 
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Katten Muchin Rosenman—Charlotte Hill

Katten Muchin Rosenman—Charlotte Hill

Katten strengthens financial markets and funds group in London

Hugh James—Keith Cundall & Lee Hart

Hugh James—Keith Cundall & Lee Hart

Hugh James expands national Serious Injury team with two new Partners

HFW—Rémi Ducloyer

HFW—Rémi Ducloyer

HFW continues Paris office growth with public law Partner hire

NEWS
The Court of Appeal's decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP has lifted months of uncertainty for Chartered Legal Executives while prompting a rethink of regulation and supervision
The assisted dying debate returns to Westminster as Lauren Edwards MP reintroduces legislation that stalled in the House of Lords last session despite clearing the Commons
A little-noticed provision of the Crime and Policing Act 2026 has fundamentally expanded corporate criminal liability
Artificial intelligence is transforming legal practice, but careless reliance on it is creating growing professional risks
The law offers cohabiting couples surprisingly greater protection after one partner dies than when they separate during life
back-to-top-scroll