header-logo header-logo

27 April 2007 / Adam Cloherty , Paul Hewitt
Issue: 7270 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Contesting validity

Paul Hewitt and Adam Cloherty report on recent cases involving forgery and stale claims on insolvent estates

In O’Brien v Seagrave [2007] EWHC 788 (Ch), [2007] All ER (D) 56 (Apr) the claimant had been the deceased’s partner for 12 years before his death in January 2005. However, following the deceased’s death, the defendants—the deceased’s long estranged ex-wife, J, and her son, the deceased’s step-son, L—produced a purported will in which the deceased apparently left his entire estate to L and L’s children. The defendants procured probate of the will in September 2005.

The claimant alleged the purported will was a forgery on the basis that the deceased could not have been at L’s house at the time the will was said to have been executed there—it was apparently witnessed by L’s partner and a friend. She commenced proceedings for the revocation of probate and a declaration that the will was invalid. Part of the motivation for the claimant’s claim was that her Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 (I(PFD)A 1975) claim

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime specialist joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
Could an online LLM in Commercial and Technology Law expand your career options?
The controversial Courts and Tribunals Bill has passed its second reading by 304 votes to 203, despite concerted opposition from the legal profession
The presumption of parental involvement is to be abolished, the Lord Chancellor David Lammy has confirmed
A highly experienced chartered legal executive has been prevented from representing her client in financial remedies proceedings, in a case that highlights the continued fallout from Mazur
Plans to commandeer 50%-75% of the interest on lawyers’ client accounts to fund the justice system overlook the cost and administrative burden of this on small and medium law firms, CILEX has warned
back-to-top-scroll