header-logo header-logo

27 April 2007 / Adam Cloherty , Paul Hewitt
Issue: 7270 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Contesting validity

Paul Hewitt and Adam Cloherty report on recent cases involving forgery and stale claims on insolvent estates

In O’Brien v Seagrave [2007] EWHC 788 (Ch), [2007] All ER (D) 56 (Apr) the claimant had been the deceased’s partner for 12 years before his death in January 2005. However, following the deceased’s death, the defendants—the deceased’s long estranged ex-wife, J, and her son, the deceased’s step-son, L—produced a purported will in which the deceased apparently left his entire estate to L and L’s children. The defendants procured probate of the will in September 2005.

The claimant alleged the purported will was a forgery on the basis that the deceased could not have been at L’s house at the time the will was said to have been executed there—it was apparently witnessed by L’s partner and a friend. She commenced proceedings for the revocation of probate and a declaration that the will was invalid. Part of the motivation for the claimant’s claim was that her Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 (I(PFD)A 1975) claim

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll