header-logo header-logo

10 December 2009 / Philip Sissons
Issue: 7397 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

Contracting out

Philip Sissons examines the effect of the decision in Newham v Van Staden

The operation of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 (LTA 1954) will be familiar to landlord and tenant practitioners. The Act affords security of tenure to business tenants so that a lease of commercial premises does not come to an end on the expiry of the contractual term but continues until terminated in accordance with the provisions of LTA 1954.

The effect of LTA 1954 can be excluded by agreement between the parties provided certain statutory requirements are met, and the decision in Newham v Van Staden [2008] EWCA Civ 1414, [2009] All ER (D) 131 (Apr) is of potentially wide-reaching effect in determining when an agreement which purports to exclude LTA 1954 will be effective.

Prior to amendments to LTA 1954 which came into force on 1 June 2004 (when a new s 38A was inserted into LTA 1954) it was necessary for the parties to apply to the court for an order authorising an agreement which excluded the security

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Family law boutique expands London team with legal director hire

Ward Hadaway—Mike Gore

Ward Hadaway—Mike Gore

Firm enhances advisory capability with strategic risk specialist hire

Stewarts—Alexandra Lyons

Stewarts—Alexandra Lyons

Insurance and reinsurance specialist joins policyholder disputes practice as partner

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
back-to-top-scroll