header-logo header-logo

10 December 2009 / Philip Sissons
Issue: 7397 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

Contracting out

Philip Sissons examines the effect of the decision in Newham v Van Staden

The operation of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 (LTA 1954) will be familiar to landlord and tenant practitioners. The Act affords security of tenure to business tenants so that a lease of commercial premises does not come to an end on the expiry of the contractual term but continues until terminated in accordance with the provisions of LTA 1954.

The effect of LTA 1954 can be excluded by agreement between the parties provided certain statutory requirements are met, and the decision in Newham v Van Staden [2008] EWCA Civ 1414, [2009] All ER (D) 131 (Apr) is of potentially wide-reaching effect in determining when an agreement which purports to exclude LTA 1954 will be effective.

Prior to amendments to LTA 1954 which came into force on 1 June 2004 (when a new s 38A was inserted into LTA 1954) it was necessary for the parties to apply to the court for an order authorising an agreement which excluded the security

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll