header-logo header-logo

Contracting-out

12 January 2012 / Roderick Ramage
Issue: 7496 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Employment
printer mail-detail

Roderick Ramage provides a rough guide to TUPE, pensions & contracting-out

Some employees’ pension protection rights, even though linked to TUPE, are not subject to restriction on contracting out.

Changing contract terms

Unless the contract expressly provides for it, no party can alter it unilaterally, but the parties can alter it consensually. Alterations of contracts are themselves made by contract. Employment contracts are no different from other contracts, but, because of the respective bargaining strengths of the parties, employers, if they stay successfully on the right side of the boundary between business justification and unfair dismissal, can vary employment contracts unilaterally by a process of an offer of new terms, consultation, warning, and eventually dismissal, coupled with an offer of reengagement on new terms: technically, if this process runs its course, what starts as a proposal to vary the contract ends as a rescission and new contract.

The contracting-out restriction

Normal contract rules do not apply to statutory employment protection rights. Employers and employees may not contract out of the latter’s statutory employment

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Firm promotes London international arbitration specialist to partnership

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Firm bolsters restructuring practice with senior London hires

HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll