header-logo header-logo

12 January 2012 / Roderick Ramage
Issue: 7496 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Employment
printer mail-detail

Contracting-out

Roderick Ramage provides a rough guide to TUPE, pensions & contracting-out

Some employees’ pension protection rights, even though linked to TUPE, are not subject to restriction on contracting out.

Changing contract terms

Unless the contract expressly provides for it, no party can alter it unilaterally, but the parties can alter it consensually. Alterations of contracts are themselves made by contract. Employment contracts are no different from other contracts, but, because of the respective bargaining strengths of the parties, employers, if they stay successfully on the right side of the boundary between business justification and unfair dismissal, can vary employment contracts unilaterally by a process of an offer of new terms, consultation, warning, and eventually dismissal, coupled with an offer of reengagement on new terms: technically, if this process runs its course, what starts as a proposal to vary the contract ends as a rescission and new contract.

The contracting-out restriction

Normal contract rules do not apply to statutory employment protection rights. Employers and employees may not contract out of the latter’s statutory employment

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
back-to-top-scroll