header-logo header-logo

Controversy over cartel reforms

22 March 2012
Issue: 7506 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Government competition law reform proposals cause outcry

City lawyers have expressed concern about proposals to remove “dishonesty” from cartel offences.

Last week, the government unveiled its final proposals for reform of the UK competition regime. They include merging the Competition Commission and the Office of Fair Trading into a new regulatory body, the Competition and Markets Authority, with powers to enforce both civil and criminal competition laws. However, a proposal to reform cartel laws is proving controversial.

Robert Bell, chairman of the City of London Law Society Competition Law Committee, says: “We have serious concerns about the proposal to remove the dishonesty element from the cartel offence (s 188, Enterprise Act 2002).

“In addition, the offence will not be made out if the parties have published details [of an agreement] before it is implemented.

“Enforcing the new offence is likely to be problematic. The government does say it will need to be subject to a required intent to enter into a cartel agreement, but it is not clear how this will be implemented. In addition, the removal of the dishonesty element will utterly transform the offence, lowering the bar to criminal prosecution and giving rise to potential injustices.”

Gustaf Duhs, head of competition at Stevens & Bolton, says: “Businesses will be required to publish agreements prior to implementation to avoid the potential for criminal prosecution. Past experience suggests that businesses will not voluntarily publish such agreements and, as a result, the risk of criminal prosecution (and up to five years’ imprisonment if convicted) will be much greater.”

Issue: 7506 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll