header-logo header-logo

Cooper defeats no-deal Brexit

09 January 2019
Issue: 7823 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Cross-party amendment to curb government’s powers on exit day

Labour MP Yvette Cooper has succeeded in blocking the government from leaving the EU without a deal unless MPs have specifically consented.

Cooper’s cross-party amendment to the Finance Bill, which passed by 303 to 296 votes, is a major victory, making the Conservatives the first ruling party to lose the Finance Bill vote in 41 years. The amendment would curb the government’s tax administration powers on the 29 March 2019 exit day unless one of three conditions has been met. These are that Parliament has approved a deal with the EU; an Art 50 extension has been agreed with the other 27 EU Member States; or Parliament has specifically consented through a vote to a no-deal Brexit.

Some 20 Conservatives rebelled to vote for Cooper’s amendment, and the Labour leadership also gave support.

Speaking in the Commons, Cooper said: ‘I think we have a responsibility not to just stand by.’

Meanwhile, barrister David Wolchover of Ridgeway Chambers, writing in NLJ this week, confidently predicts that both opposition and ruling parties will eventually support a second referendum, if the prime minister’s deal is defeated (see p12).

This new People’s Vote could remedy the ‘fiasco’ of the first one, Wolchover says, as long as it was ‘properly constructed and managed’ and included a threshold. The mechanism for it could be a standalone bill in the House of Lords along with a separate Bill postponing the 29 March 2019 exit day.

Wolchover reiterates the point that the 2016 referendum was advisory only and contends that Theresa May’s decision to activate Art 50 on the basis alone of the referendum result ‘flew in the face of the EU Referendum Act 2015 and as such was arguably unconstitutional’. He also complains of ‘barefaced gerrymandering’ since nearly a million expatriates were denied a vote and of ‘serious criminal offending’ in terms of Vote Leave’s £450,000 overspend above the £7m limit.

Issue: 7823 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
In NLJ this week, Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre marks Pro Bono Week by urging lawyers to recognise the emotional toll of pro bono work
Can a lease legally last only days—or even hours? Professor Mark Pawlowski of the University of Greenwich explores the question in this week's NLJ
RFC Seraing v FIFA, in which the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) reaffirmed that awards by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) may be reviewed by EU courts on public-policy grounds, is under examination in this week's NLJ by Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law, Zurich
back-to-top-scroll