header-logo header-logo

Coronavirus & education appeals

18 June 2020 / Neil Parpworth
Issue: 7891 / Categories: Features , Education
printer mail-detail
22935
Neil Parpworth reviews changes & challenges to the education appeal system in response to COVID-19
  • Outlines changes to the education appeals system made in response to the coronavirus pandemic and in place until 31 January 2021.

While education news stories frequently arise during normal times, they have become even more prevalent during the current pandemic. School closures, the cancellation of GCSE and A-Level exams, online support for home-schooling etc, have all received substantial media coverage during the course of recent weeks. An issue which has received less attention, however, is how the education appeals system is being adapted so that it may continue to operate during these very difficult times. In the discussion which follows, therefore, the key changes to the system will be explained.

Preference

It is a common misconception that parents and carers are able to ‘choose’ the primary and secondary schools which their children attend. The reality is, however, that they are merely able to express a preference as to where their child is educated: see s 86(1)(a)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll