header-logo header-logo

18 June 2020 / Neil Parpworth
Issue: 7891 / Categories: Features , Education
printer mail-detail

Coronavirus & education appeals

22935
Neil Parpworth reviews changes & challenges to the education appeal system in response to COVID-19
  • Outlines changes to the education appeals system made in response to the coronavirus pandemic and in place until 31 January 2021.

While education news stories frequently arise during normal times, they have become even more prevalent during the current pandemic. School closures, the cancellation of GCSE and A-Level exams, online support for home-schooling etc, have all received substantial media coverage during the course of recent weeks. An issue which has received less attention, however, is how the education appeals system is being adapted so that it may continue to operate during these very difficult times. In the discussion which follows, therefore, the key changes to the system will be explained.

Preference

It is a common misconception that parents and carers are able to ‘choose’ the primary and secondary schools which their children attend. The reality is, however, that they are merely able to express a preference as to where their child is educated: see s 86(1)(a)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll