header-logo header-logo

Corporate lawyers ‘exhausted’

13 October 2021
Issue: 7952 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail
Exhausted lawyers regularly cause delays to business projects, suffer psychological distress and often seek to leave their firm, researchers have found

A survey of more than 200 corporate lawyers by Gartner, Inc in July found the pandemic has left 54% of lawyers exhausted, with 20% ‘highly exhausted’.

Of those who scored as highly exhausted, 41% showed signs of psychological distress, 68% were looking to leave the organization, and 61% frequently delayed or killed projects in which they were involved.

The lawyers’ exhaustion levels were evaluated using a modified Bergen burnout inventory, which is a set of questions commonly used to quantify exhaustion.

The results revealed how even moderate exhaustion can hinder progress―three per cent of lawyers who scored as not exhausted were psychologically distressed, but this figure jumped to 28% for the moderately exhausted. Similarly, nine per cent of not exhausted lawyers were found to frequently delay, scale down or kill projects, but this figure leaped to 34% for moderately exhausted lawyers.

‘The fact that many corporate lawyers are exhausted is probably not that surprising to legal leaders after the pressures of the pandemic,’ said James Crocker, senior principal, research in the Gartner Legal & Compliance practice.

‘But what stands out is the degree to which even moderate levels of exhaustion lead to severely negative outcomes for the individuals themselves, the legal department, and the overall business. The fact that more than two thirds of highly exhausted lawyers are looking to leave the company, and the extent to which even moderate exhaustion is associated with quantifiable psychological distress among corporate lawyers should be a cause for concern for legal leaders.’

According to Gartner’s research, lawyers who were ‘highly engaged’ with their work were less likely to suffer exhaustion. It found just 4% of lawyers were both highly exhausted and highly engaged. Engaged lawyers tended to have personally fulfilling work and be well-rewarded.

Issue: 7952 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll