header-logo header-logo

24 February 2023 / Dr Charanjit Singh
Issue: 8014 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Correcting mistakes in the magistrates’ courts

112061
To what extent has the Court of Appeal clarified the power of the magistrates’ court to reopen cases in order to rectify mistakes? Dr Charanjit Singh reports
  • Examines R (on the application of Simon Williamson) v City of Westminster, in which the Court of Appeal has sought to define the application of s 142 of the Magistrates Court Act 1980 (MCA 1980).
  • Presents a practical examination of case law and explores the implications for defendants’ seeking to reopen their cases following a guilty plea and sentencing.
  • Notes the current position of the law under s 142, MCA 1980.

Few would argue against the notion that some of the systemic safeguards designed to mitigate miscarriages of justice, prevent the abuse of due process, and assure that convictions of the guilty are beyond reasonable doubt (Woolmington v DPP [1935] AC 462) are some of the most important aspects of British criminal justice.

The decision of the Court of Appeal in R (on the application of Williamson)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Partner and Manchester office lead appointed head of family

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

DWF insurance services director appointed to Civil Justice Council

R3—Jodie Wildridge

R3—Jodie Wildridge

Kings Chambers barrister appointed chair of R3 Yorkshire

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll