header-logo header-logo

06 July 2012
Issue: 7521 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Costs

Musion Systems Ltd v Activ8-3D Ltd and others [2012] EWPCC 5, [2012] All ER (D) 172 (Jun)

The question of making an order for costs was one for the court’s discretion, and all relevant circumstances fell to be considered. If the court was not in a position to enforce interlocutory costs orders, the force of the sanction would be seriously undermined. Other options apart from the order sought had to be considered. It was always important to have regard to Art 6 of the Convention. Orders requiring payment of costs as a condition of proceeding with litigation were not made in circumstances where to enforce such an order would drive a party from access to justice.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Heather Gibson

Freeths—Heather Gibson

Freeths strengthens national tax team with Heather Gibson appointment

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise expands London secondaries team with addition of Mary Lavelle

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law welcomes ex-Irwin Mitchell team to launch Hestia Private Client

NEWS
Lawyers have welcomed plans to create specialist rape and serious sex offences courtrooms at every Crown Court
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
back-to-top-scroll