header-logo header-logo

01 March 2013
Issue: 7550 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Costs

Tecof International Ltd v Town Castle Ltd and others [2013] Lexis Citation 16, [2013] All ER (D) 215 (Feb)

Section 51 of the Senior Courts Act 1981 conferred a discretion not confined by specific limitations. Although costs orders against non-parties were to be regarded as "exceptional", exceptional in that context meant no more than outside the ordinary run of cases where parties pursued or defended claims for their own benefit and at their own expense. The ultimate question in any such "exceptional" case was whether in all the circumstances it was just to make the order. Where a non-party director could be described as the "real party", seeking his own benefit, controlling and/or funding the litigation, then even where he had acted in good faith or without any impropriety, justice might well demand that he be liable in costs on a fact-sensitive and objective assessment of the circumstances

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll