header-logo header-logo

04 July 2014
Issue: 7613 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Costs

Deutsche Bank AG v Sebastian Holdings Incorporated and another [2014] EWHC 2073 (Comm), [2014] All ER (D) 209 (Jun)

With respect to lis alibi pendens, it was plain from a number of authorities that an application under s 51 of the Senior Courts Act 1981 did not involve the assertion of a cause of action, but was a request for the exercise by the English court of a statutory discretion in relation to proceedings in which the court already had jurisdiction and had usually already given judgment against a party subject to that jurisdiction. No court in any other jurisdiction could exercise that discretion. Further, the immunity of a witness did not prevent his evidence being used to establish liability for costs in a s 51 application, as such use was an exception to the general principle. 

 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

mfg Solicitors—Hayley Pearce & Lauren Williams

mfg Solicitors—Hayley Pearce & Lauren Williams

Law firm mfg Solicitors announces promotions at Ludlow office

Womble Bond Dickinson—Richard Sharpe

Womble Bond Dickinson—Richard Sharpe

Womble Bond Dickinson appoints partner in Leeds residential team

Brabners—six promotions

Brabners—six promotions

Brabners adds six to partnership in record year for partner promotions

NEWS
The legal profession's AI challenge extends far beyond fabricated case citations, according to a warning about the next phase of technological risk
Law firms should use the transition period before the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) assumes anti-money laundering (AML) supervision to strengthen governance and compliance, experts have warned
Cross-border disputes increasingly demand creative approaches to gathering evidence, with litigators needing to look beyond traditional letters of request
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified the distinction between contracts of 'indefinite' and 'perpetual' duration, with potentially significant implications for commercial drafting
The Court of Appeal was entitled to uphold the government's decision to proscribe Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation, according to an analysis of the ruling
back-to-top-scroll