header-logo header-logo

Costs

04 July 2014
Issue: 7613 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Deutsche Bank AG v Sebastian Holdings Incorporated and another [2014] EWHC 2073 (Comm), [2014] All ER (D) 209 (Jun)

With respect to lis alibi pendens, it was plain from a number of authorities that an application under s 51 of the Senior Courts Act 1981 did not involve the assertion of a cause of action, but was a request for the exercise by the English court of a statutory discretion in relation to proceedings in which the court already had jurisdiction and had usually already given judgment against a party subject to that jurisdiction. No court in any other jurisdiction could exercise that discretion. Further, the immunity of a witness did not prevent his evidence being used to establish liability for costs in a s 51 application, as such use was an exception to the general principle. 

 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll