header-logo header-logo

06 February 2015
Issue: 7639 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Costs

McGraddie v McGraddie and another [2015] UKSC 1, [2015] All ER (D) 208 (Jan)

Following his successful appeal (see [2013] All ER (D) 384 (Jul)), the claimant sought an order that the Scottish Legal Aid Board (the Board) pay his expenses, including his after the event insurance (ATE) premium. The Supreme Court held that, absent agreement or a specific statutory sanction to the contrary, a successful party to litigation could not recover an ATE premium, however reasonably incurred, as part of his costs or expenses of legal proceedings. Accordingly, the claimant would be awarded his expenses of the appeals to the Extra Division of the Inner House and to the court against the Board, but not the ATE premium.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
back-to-top-scroll