header-logo header-logo

25 October 2013
Issue: 7581 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Costs—EAT

Graham v University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and others UKEAT/0130/13/LA, [2013] All ER (D) 58 (Oct)

It was established law that an appeal on costs could only succeed on the basis of an error of law. In relation to costs, that would include taking into consideration something irrelevant or something that was clearly wrong in the exercise of the discretion. If proceedings were misconceived, namely, had no reasonable prospect of success, and the tribunal considered it appropriate to do so, it could make an order for costs. It could specify the sum as long as it was under £20,000, and it could, if it say fit, have regard to the payer’s ability to pay when it came to decide whether to make an order and what that sum should be. 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll