header-logo header-logo

Costs for the acquitted defendant

10 June 2020 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7890 / Categories: Features , Profession , Criminal , Costs
printer mail-detail
22391
An acquitted defendant may find himself out of pocket. Alec Samuels discusses the options for recompense
  • The duty of the state is to follow the rules and bring the guilty to conviction, but at the same time to protect the unconvicted and therefore innocent citizen.

The defendant was acquitted. His costs were considerable. A matter for judicial discretion, the court ordered costs in his favour. He then applied for a defendant’s costs order (DCO) from central funds (not the Crown Prosecution Service or the police).

The DCO

If costs were awarded, they would be capped at legal aid rates. Factors the court may take into account include the importance of the charge, the conduct of the defendant, whether he brought suspicion on himself, whether he misled the prosecution into thinking that the case against him was stronger than it really was, or whether he withheld relevant information. Were the costs actually, reasonably and properly incurred, and reasonable in amount? Would an order be appropriate, reasonable and just? Relevant authorities

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hamlins—Maddox Legal

Hamlins—Maddox Legal

London firm announces acquisition of corporate team

Ward Hadaway—Nik Tunley

Ward Hadaway—Nik Tunley

Head of corporate appointed following Teesside merger

Taylor Rose—Russell Jarvis

Taylor Rose—Russell Jarvis

Firm expands into banking and finance sector with newly appointed head of banking

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll