header-logo header-logo

Costs for the acquitted defendant

10 June 2020 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7890 / Categories: Features , Profession , Criminal , Costs
printer mail-detail
22391
An acquitted defendant may find himself out of pocket. Alec Samuels discusses the options for recompense
  • The duty of the state is to follow the rules and bring the guilty to conviction, but at the same time to protect the unconvicted and therefore innocent citizen.

The defendant was acquitted. His costs were considerable. A matter for judicial discretion, the court ordered costs in his favour. He then applied for a defendant’s costs order (DCO) from central funds (not the Crown Prosecution Service or the police).

The DCO

If costs were awarded, they would be capped at legal aid rates. Factors the court may take into account include the importance of the charge, the conduct of the defendant, whether he brought suspicion on himself, whether he misled the prosecution into thinking that the case against him was stronger than it really was, or whether he withheld relevant information. Were the costs actually, reasonably and properly incurred, and reasonable in amount? Would an order be appropriate, reasonable and just? Relevant authorities

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll